Guest guest Posted February 25, 2006 Report Share Posted February 25, 2006 Dear All, We have been reading both sides of the Ek mukhi goal dhana discussion. Both sides have made their conclusions one way or another. I feel the really valuable lesson seems to be that the material limitations and the word "impossible" can not always apply in the case of Rudraksha, which is supernatural. A sacred object might turn out opposite of nature by the power over looking the object. Thus even a conch shell, which always open on the left, could be opposite and open on the right (dakshinvarti). Most, 99% of Valampuri are fakes, but the real ones are not "impossible" - as we have a real one in our care. So the word "impossible" seems to be out of context with relation to sacred objects like natural Rudraksha. The power of Rudraksha is for peace and knowledge. So this subject should never be reduced to arguement and disagreement leading to ahamkar and anger. We are all part of the same truth and should avoid the trap of anger. Please, there should be no ill-will at all regarding Sri Rudraksha Mani. The bead for sale in Nepal simply needs a dental X-ray and then it will be easy for the sellers to market. The real question is, WHY would anyone sell a goal dhana Ek-mukhi? If it is because the owner needs money then that itself might cast doubt. Best wishes Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2006 Report Share Posted February 26, 2006 Rudraksha.The power of Rudraksha is for peace and knowledge. So this subjectshould never be reduced to arguement and disagreement leading toahamkar and anger. We are all part of the same truth and should avoidthe trap of anger. Please, there should be no ill-will at all regardingSri Rudraksha Mani. The bead for sale in Nepal simply needs a dental X-ray and then it willbe easy for the sellers to market. The real question is, WHY wouldanyone sell a goal dhana Ek-mukhi? If it is because the owner needsmoney then that itself might cast doubt.Best wishesSend instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2006 Report Share Posted February 26, 2006 Conclusion is: It's possible to have a round eka mukhi, but highly unlikely. There are mostly fakes. Genuine can be tested using X-ray. Question is, WHY? Would anyone sell away such a sacred object??? sacred-objects, GivLivLight <shombaz wrote: > > all this is very confusing ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2006 Report Share Posted February 28, 2006 Hi Richard, Good points, but what would be the conclusion of an X-ray examination for a supposedly genuine round bead with one natural formed mukhi line? Do you think it is to be considered natural only it has only one seed inside? Otherwise the X-ray test would be unnecessary, unless the X-ray can detect artifical mukhi lines? I looked at some detailed closeups of the bead provided by Nepa Rudraksha (uploaded to Open Rudraksha forum) and it would appear from these pics that there is at least one additional mukhi line, although it does not extend completely. I can upload them here if it has interest. ~ Ole sacred-objects, "Richard Shaw-Brown II" <rsbj66 wrote: > > Conclusion is: It's possible to have a round eka mukhi, but highly unlikely. There are > mostly fakes. Genuine can be tested using X-ray. Question is, WHY? Would anyone sell > away such a sacred object??? > > sacred-objects, GivLivLight <shombaz@> wrote: > > > > all this is very confusing ! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Dear Ole, Namaste!!! I not an expert in this. But RR experts can tell from X-ray if the bead is cut down from a bigger bead. And also has one seed. The only people I know who are competent are Sri Chandrashekarji, and specially experienced are Rudra Center in Mumbai. Best rgds, Richard sacred-objects, "alstrup" <alstrup wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > Good points, but what would be the conclusion of an X-ray examination > for a supposedly genuine round bead with one natural formed mukhi > line? Do you think it is to be considered natural only it has only one > seed inside? Otherwise the X-ray test would be unnecessary, unless the > X-ray can detect artifical mukhi lines? > > I looked at some detailed closeups of the bead provided by Nepa > Rudraksha (uploaded to Open Rudraksha forum) and it would appear > from these pics that there is at least one additional mukhi line, > although it does not extend completely. I can upload them here if it > has interest. > > ~ Ole > > sacred-objects, "Richard Shaw-Brown II" > <rsbj66@> wrote: > > > > Conclusion is: It's possible to have a round eka mukhi, but highly > unlikely. There are > > mostly fakes. Genuine can be tested using X-ray. Question is, WHY? > Would anyone sell > > away such a sacred object??? > > > > sacred-objects, GivLivLight <shombaz@> wrote: > > > > > > all this is very confusing ! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 this. But RR experts can tell from X-ray if the bead is cut down from a bigger bead. And also has one seed. The only people I know who are competent are Sri Chandrashekarji, and specially experienced are Rudra Center in Mumbai.Best rgds,Richardsacred-objects, "alstrup" <alstrup wrote:>> Hi Richard,> > Good points, but what would be the conclusion of an X-ray examination > for a supposedly genuine round bead with one natural formed mukhi > line? Do you think it is to be considered natural only it has only one > seed inside? Otherwise the X-ray test would be unnecessary, unless the > X-ray can detect artifical mukhi lines?> > I looked at some detailed closeups of the bead provided by Nepa > Rudraksha (uploaded to Open Rudraksha forum) and it would appear > from these pics that there is at least one additional mukhi line, > although it does not extend completely. I can upload them here if it > has interest. > > ~ Ole> > sacred-objects, "Richard Shaw-Brown II" > <rsbj66@> wrote:> >> > Conclusion is: It's possible to have a round eka mukhi, but highly > unlikely. There are > > mostly fakes. Genuine can be tested using X-ray. Question is, WHY? > Would anyone sell > > away such a sacred object???> > > > sacred-objects, GivLivLight <shombaz@> wrote:> > >> > > all this is very confusing !> >> Cars NEW - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online search now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.