Guest guest Posted February 25, 2006 Report Share Posted February 25, 2006 Ego, Anger..shadripu....thank you for this post sir..with best regards aadi sacred-objects, Richard Shaw Brown <rsbj66 wrote: > > Dear All, > > We have been reading both sides of the Ek mukhi goal dhana discussion. > Both sides have made their conclusions one way or another. > > I feel the really valuable lesson seems to be that the material > limitations and the word "impossible" can not always apply in the case > of Rudraksha, which is supernatural. > > A sacred object might turn out opposite of nature by the power over > looking the object. Thus even a conch shell, which always open on the > left, could be opposite and open on the right (dakshinvarti). Most, 99% > of Valampuri are fakes, but the real ones are not "impossible" - as we > have a real one in our care. > > So the word "impossible" seems to be out of context with relation to > sacred objects like natural Rudraksha. > > The power of Rudraksha is for peace and knowledge. So this subject > should never be reduced to arguement and disagreement leading to > ahamkar and anger. We are all part of the same truth and should avoid > the trap of anger. Please, there should be no ill-will at all regarding > Sri Rudraksha Mani. > > The bead for sale in Nepal simply needs a dental X-ray and then it will > be easy for the sellers to market. The real question is, WHY would > anyone sell a goal dhana Ek-mukhi? If it is because the owner needs > money then that itself might cast doubt. > > Best wishes > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.