Can beads touch each other?/ face to face, rear to rear?

[Guest guest]

"ShiningLotus" <shininglotus@c...> wrote:

> When placed face to face and rear part to rear part in pairs the

natural effects are enhanced

 

*****Which is face and which is rear? (no jokes please, hehe)

 

Soma

[Guest guest]

DANG! I was JUST gonna post some jokes....

 

Kanti posted some advisement, on this, not long ago. It's easy, with

the middle-range of muhki-- about 4-9. The nose it more "pointy" with

a well-defined hole. On the 2 and 3 mukhis, one has to look at which

way the protruberances are "laying" (most of them point away from the

nose).

 

I'm not sure I've done the BIG ones right (but, Kanti will correct

me, if I haven't). I think the nose on the, say, tens-14s have the

better defined hole, and the bottom is "rougher." I hope I'm right on

this, because I'd hate to reassemble that mala, yet again. <g>

 

 

, "somaphoenixx"

<somaphoenixx> wrote:

> "ShiningLotus" <shininglotus@c...> wrote:

> > When placed face to face and rear part to rear part in pairs the

> natural effects are enhanced

>

> *****Which is face and which is rear? (no jokes please, hehe)

>

> Soma

[Guest guest]

Dear Somaji

 

Namaskar My Friend

 

Miss Kanti is really close to you and might be able to show you each of the

Mukhis

 

Thanks and Take Care

 

DharmaDev

 

somaphoenixx <somaphoenixx

 

<>

Monday, March 10, 2003 7:54 AM

Re: Can beads touch each other?/ face to face, rear to rear?

 

 

"ShiningLotus" <shininglotus@c...> wrote:

> When placed face to face and rear part to rear part in pairs the

natural effects are enhanced

 

*****Which is face and which is rear? (no jokes please, hehe)

 

Soma

 

 

Sponsor

 

 

 

 

To send an email to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

LOL....Thanks Kariji for the reply. I was thinking the other way

around (won't mention why) but thanks for the clearification.

 

Soma

 

, karisprowl

<no_reply> wrote:

> DANG! I was JUST gonna post some jokes....

>

> Kanti posted some advisement, on this, not long ago. It's easy,

with

> the middle-range of muhki-- about 4-9. The nose it more "pointy"

with

> a well-defined hole. On the 2 and 3 mukhis, one has to look at

which

> way the protruberances are "laying" (most of them point away from

the

> nose).

>

> I'm not sure I've done the BIG ones right (but, Kanti will correct

> me, if I haven't). I think the nose on the, say, tens-14s have the

> better defined hole, and the bottom is "rougher." I hope I'm right

on

> this, because I'd hate to reassemble that mala, yet again. <g>

>

>

> , "somaphoenixx"

> <somaphoenixx> wrote:

> > "ShiningLotus" <shininglotus@c...> wrote:

> > > When placed face to face and rear part to rear part in pairs

the

> > natural effects are enhanced

> >

> > *****Which is face and which is rear? (no jokes please, hehe)

> >

> > Soma

[Guest guest]

Gee, honey! The way things can face was gonna be one of my

innapropriate jokes! <g>

 

 

 

, "somaphoenixx"

<somaphoenixx> wrote:

> LOL....Thanks Kariji for the reply. I was thinking the other way

> around (won't mention why) but thanks for the clearification.

>

> Soma

>

> , karisprowl

> <no_reply> wrote:

> > DANG! I was JUST gonna post some jokes....

> >

> > Kanti posted some advisement, on this, not long ago. It's easy,

> with

> > the middle-range of muhki-- about 4-9. The nose it more "pointy"

> with

> > a well-defined hole. On the 2 and 3 mukhis, one has to look at

> which

> > way the protruberances are "laying" (most of them point away from

> the

> > nose).

> >

> > I'm not sure I've done the BIG ones right (but, Kanti will

correct

> > me, if I haven't). I think the nose on the, say, tens-14s have

the

> > better defined hole, and the bottom is "rougher." I hope I'm

right

> on

> > this, because I'd hate to reassemble that mala, yet again. <g>

> >

> >

> > , "somaphoenixx"

> > <somaphoenixx> wrote:

> > > "ShiningLotus" <shininglotus@c...> wrote:

> > > > When placed face to face and rear part to rear part in pairs

> the

> > > natural effects are enhanced

> > >

> > > *****Which is face and which is rear? (no jokes please, hehe)

> > >

> > > Soma

[Guest guest]

ROTFLM-r(rear)O

 

, karisprowl

<no_reply> wrote:

> Gee, honey! The way things can face was gonna be one of my

> innapropriate jokes! <g>

>

>

>

> , "somaphoenixx"

> <somaphoenixx> wrote:

> > LOL....Thanks Kariji for the reply. I was thinking the other way

> > around (won't mention why) but thanks for the clearification.

> >

> > Soma

> >

> > , karisprowl

> > <no_reply> wrote:

> > > DANG! I was JUST gonna post some jokes....

> > >

> > > Kanti posted some advisement, on this, not long ago. It's

easy,

> > with

> > > the middle-range of muhki-- about 4-9. The nose it

more "pointy"

> > with

> > > a well-defined hole. On the 2 and 3 mukhis, one has to look at

> > which

> > > way the protruberances are "laying" (most of them point away

from

> > the

> > > nose).

> > >

> > > I'm not sure I've done the BIG ones right (but, Kanti will

> correct

> > > me, if I haven't). I think the nose on the, say, tens-14s have

> the

> > > better defined hole, and the bottom is "rougher." I hope I'm

> right

> > on

> > > this, because I'd hate to reassemble that mala, yet again. <g>

> > >

> > >

> > > --- In

, "somaphoenixx"

> > > <somaphoenixx> wrote:

> > > > "ShiningLotus" <shininglotus@c...> wrote:

> > > > > When placed face to face and rear part to rear part in

pairs

> > the

> > > > natural effects are enhanced

> > > >

> > > > *****Which is face and which is rear? (no jokes please, hehe)

> > > >

> > > > Soma