DNA Finger Printing in Rudrakshas

[Guest guest]

Dear Ole,

 

I would like to know, whether Dr, Glen Rein has done any research on DNA Finger

Printing of different mukhi Rudrakshas ? If yes, I would like to know the

details of his research article i.e. Title, Research Journal, year of

publication, page nos. etc. To my knowledge no body so far has done the above

studies in Rudrakshas, though it is very essential.

 

Thanking you and with best wishes.

 

Chandrashekhar Phadke

 

alstrup <alstrup wrote:

Dear Suraj,

 

Thanks for your comments!

 

Did you read the Subas Rai book?

 

As for the claims from Dr. Ramesh about a tachyonized bead of any

mukhi taking on energetic characteristics of all natural beads/mukhis

combined; Ramesh has not done any scientic research that I am aware

of, otherwise he would certainly have chosen to answer the related

questions I asked him in my letters, all I have is his claims based

on his own experiences and the people who obtain them from his

workshops. But I can inform you that his energetic theory relating to

the tachyonization effect on Rudraksha beads is not in harmony with

the official paradigm from the Tachyon Institute.

In any case, I shortly intend to test a tachyonized 5-mukhi bead

against a full natural Siddha mala and may have that mala or another

Siddha mala custom tachyonized.

Btw, there is no need to obtain tachyonized beads through Dr. Ramesh,

if anyone wants to, they can send their own Rudraksha beads to ATTI

in California and have them custom tachyonized. I also think that can

be done cheaper, Dr. Ramesh charges $50 for a tachyonized bead,

typically a large excellent 5- or 6-Mukhi from Nepal. (he wouldnt

disclose who his wholeseller was)

 

Provided my own test of tachyonized beads will reveal somehow that

Dr. Ramesh may be on to something, then I would definitely encourage

DDji, Syji and other experienced Rudraksha users to begin testing

such tachyonized beads themselves for comparison with regular beads.

 

As for the energetic effects of other tachyonized products from

Advanced Tachyon Technologies, there is quite a lot of diverse

research having been done by researchers in different fields,

including some very interesting DNA studies by the biophysicist Dr.

Glen Rein. Much of that research is published in the Tachyon book by

David Wagner, the inventor of the Tachyonization process and Dr.

Gabriel Cousens.

 

Ole

 

 

 

--- In

, "surajraghavan2002"

<suraj_raghavan@h...> wrote:

> Elizabeth wrote, "Scientifically, this website appears to be a

load

> of rubbish. ...And, if there's simply no solid scientific work on

the

> beads, then let's dispense of speaking of them in scientific terms

> until there is. OTherwise, it just looks like more energetic jive

> talk such as you see all over the place in half-baked New Age

> products and literature, and my sense is, that these beads deserve

> better than that..."

>

> Amen! I wasted 4 years at university to get an electrical

engineering

> degree:-) (i don't do it professionally though) and i can assure

you

> that the article is bollocks. You can see the flaws with even a

basic

> knowledge of electronics. Without getting into jargon, the problem

> with this article is that it claims that the benefits of

Rudraksha's

> are due to its electro magnetic properties. As your friend pointed

> out, these are quantifiable so where are the results? Also,

assuming

> say the 5 mukhi bead that was tested by Rai's team exhibited a

> certain capacitance, what is the guarantee that the 5 mukhi you are

> wearing would do the same? Which brings me to tachyonisation. I

have

> major problems with this as well. Here the theory seems to be that

by

> doing a process (tachyonisation) to a bead you can make that bead

> take on the energetic characteristics of beads with different

mukhis.

> For this you need to 1) know what the numbers are for the various

> mukhis (an unknown as far as i can tell, unless Dr. Ramesh or

whoever

> it is that is marketing this can prove otherwise) 2)prove that

these

> numbers are uniform within a certain tolerance (that is if you can

> prove that the 7 mukhi from your tree and that from your neighbor's

> tree both exhibit the same quantifiable charateristics give or take

a

> microfarad for example) 3)prove that after tachyonisation beads

with

> different mukhis exhibit the same quantifiable characteristics.

> Since to prove 2) and 3) you would first need to establish 1) the

> theory, IMO, falls flat on its tachyonized face:-)

> I love rudrakshas but trying to prove their worth in pseudo

> scientific jargon is IMO the big problem.

> Suraj

 

To send an email to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

India Matrimony: Find your partner online.Post your profile.

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar Phadke,

 

Namaskar

 

I was not ab le to post here since last time because of work. What

is that DNA Finger Printing research? I agree, a researcher like Dr

Glen Rein should be motivated to do some serious studies on

Rudraksha. I dont have his email contact or am aware if he has a

website, but would be a good idea if someone could contact him,

perhaps Rudra Centre could do it. I will see if I can find a contact

for him in a few days and will update.

 

Thanks,

 

Ole

 

, chandrashekhar

phadke <chphadke> wrote:

> Dear Ole,

>

> I would like to know, whether Dr, Glen Rein has done any research

on DNA Finger Printing of different mukhi Rudrakshas ? If yes, I

would like to know the details of his research article i.e. Title,

Research Journal, year of publication, page nos. etc. To my

knowledge no body so far has done the above studies in Rudrakshas,

though it is very essential.

>

> Thanking you and with best wishes.

>

> Chandrashekhar Phadke

>

> alstrup <alstrup> wrote:

> Dear Suraj,

>

> Thanks for your comments!

>

> Did you read the Subas Rai book?

>

> As for the claims from Dr. Ramesh about a tachyonized bead of any

> mukhi taking on energetic characteristics of all natural

beads/mukhis

> combined; Ramesh has not done any scientic research that I am

aware

> of, otherwise he would certainly have chosen to answer the related

> questions I asked him in my letters, all I have is his claims

based

> on his own experiences and the people who obtain them from his

> workshops. But I can inform you that his energetic theory relating

to

> the tachyonization effect on Rudraksha beads is not in harmony

with

> the official paradigm from the Tachyon Institute.

> In any case, I shortly intend to test a tachyonized 5-mukhi bead

> against a full natural Siddha mala and may have that mala or

another

> Siddha mala custom tachyonized.

> Btw, there is no need to obtain tachyonized beads through Dr.

Ramesh,

> if anyone wants to, they can send their own Rudraksha beads to

ATTI

> in California and have them custom tachyonized. I also think that

can

> be done cheaper, Dr. Ramesh charges $50 for a tachyonized bead,

> typically a large excellent 5- or 6-Mukhi from Nepal. (he wouldnt

> disclose who his wholeseller was)

>

> Provided my own test of tachyonized beads will reveal somehow that

> Dr. Ramesh may be on to something, then I would definitely

encourage

> DDji, Syji and other experienced Rudraksha users to begin testing

> such tachyonized beads themselves for comparison with regular

beads.

>

> As for the energetic effects of other tachyonized products from

> Advanced Tachyon Technologies, there is quite a lot of diverse

> research having been done by researchers in different fields,

> including some very interesting DNA studies by the biophysicist

Dr.

> Glen Rein. Much of that research is published in the Tachyon book

by

> David Wagner, the inventor of the Tachyonization process and Dr.

> Gabriel Cousens.

>

> Ole

>

>

>

> --- In

> , "surajraghavan2002"

> <suraj_raghavan@h...> wrote:

> > Elizabeth wrote, "Scientifically, this website appears to be a

> load

> > of rubbish. ...And, if there's simply no solid scientific work

on

> the

> > beads, then let's dispense of speaking of them in scientific

terms

> > until there is. OTherwise, it just looks like more energetic

jive

> > talk such as you see all over the place in half-baked New Age

> > products and literature, and my sense is, that these beads

deserve

> > better than that..."

> >

> > Amen! I wasted 4 years at university to get an electrical

> engineering

> > degree:-) (i don't do it professionally though) and i can assure

> you

> > that the article is bollocks. You can see the flaws with even a

> basic

> > knowledge of electronics. Without getting into jargon, the

problem

> > with this article is that it claims that the benefits of

> Rudraksha's

> > are due to its electro magnetic properties. As your friend

pointed

> > out, these are quantifiable so where are the results? Also,

> assuming

> > say the 5 mukhi bead that was tested by Rai's team exhibited a

> > certain capacitance, what is the guarantee that the 5 mukhi you

are

> > wearing would do the same? Which brings me to tachyonisation. I

> have

> > major problems with this as well. Here the theory seems to be

that

> by

> > doing a process (tachyonisation) to a bead you can make that

bead

> > take on the energetic characteristics of beads with different

> mukhis.

> > For this you need to 1) know what the numbers are for the

various

> > mukhis (an unknown as far as i can tell, unless Dr. Ramesh or

> whoever

> > it is that is marketing this can prove otherwise) 2)prove that

> these

> > numbers are uniform within a certain tolerance (that is if you

can

> > prove that the 7 mukhi from your tree and that from your

neighbor's

> > tree both exhibit the same quantifiable charateristics give or

take

> a

> > microfarad for example) 3)prove that after tachyonisation beads

> with

> > different mukhis exhibit the same quantifiable characteristics.

> > Since to prove 2) and 3) you would first need to establish 1)

the

> > theory, IMO, falls flat on its tachyonized face:-)

> > I love rudrakshas but trying to prove their worth in pseudo

> > scientific jargon is IMO the big problem.

> > Suraj

>

>

> Sponsor

>

> To send an email to: -

 

>

>

>

> Terms of

Service.

>

> India Matrimony: Find your partner online.Post your profile.

>

>