DNA Finger Printing in Rudrakshas

[Guest guest]

Namaste Respected Friends,

 

I'm interested in the research journal too. Please keep us posted

Oleji, thanks.

 

Om Namah Shivaya

Sy

 

, "alstrup"

<alstrup> wrote:

> Dear Chandrashekhar Phadke,

>

> Namaskar

>

> I was not ab le to post here since last time because of work. What

> is that DNA Finger Printing research? I agree, a researcher like Dr

> Glen Rein should be motivated to do some serious studies on

> Rudraksha. I dont have his email contact or am aware if he has a

> website, but would be a good idea if someone could contact him,

> perhaps Rudra Centre could do it. I will see if I can find a

contact

> for him in a few days and will update.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Ole

>

> , chandrashekhar

> phadke <chphadke> wrote:

> > Dear Ole,

> >

> > I would like to know, whether Dr, Glen Rein has done any research

> on DNA Finger Printing of different mukhi Rudrakshas ? If yes, I

> would like to know the details of his research article i.e. Title,

> Research Journal, year of publication, page nos. etc. To my

> knowledge no body so far has done the above studies in Rudrakshas,

> though it is very essential.

> >

> > Thanking you and with best wishes.

> >

> > Chandrashekhar Phadke

> >

> > alstrup <alstrup> wrote:

> > Dear Suraj,

> >

> > Thanks for your comments!

> >

> > Did you read the Subas Rai book?

> >

> > As for the claims from Dr. Ramesh about a tachyonized bead of any

> > mukhi taking on energetic characteristics of all natural

> beads/mukhis

> > combined; Ramesh has not done any scientic research that I am

> aware

> > of, otherwise he would certainly have chosen to answer the

related

> > questions I asked him in my letters, all I have is his claims

> based

> > on his own experiences and the people who obtain them from his

> > workshops. But I can inform you that his energetic theory

relating

> to

> > the tachyonization effect on Rudraksha beads is not in harmony

> with

> > the official paradigm from the Tachyon Institute.

> > In any case, I shortly intend to test a tachyonized 5-mukhi bead

> > against a full natural Siddha mala and may have that mala or

> another

> > Siddha mala custom tachyonized.

> > Btw, there is no need to obtain tachyonized beads through Dr.

> Ramesh,

> > if anyone wants to, they can send their own Rudraksha beads to

> ATTI

> > in California and have them custom tachyonized. I also think that

> can

> > be done cheaper, Dr. Ramesh charges $50 for a tachyonized bead,

> > typically a large excellent 5- or 6-Mukhi from Nepal. (he wouldnt

> > disclose who his wholeseller was)

> >

> > Provided my own test of tachyonized beads will reveal somehow

that

> > Dr. Ramesh may be on to something, then I would definitely

> encourage

> > DDji, Syji and other experienced Rudraksha users to begin testing

> > such tachyonized beads themselves for comparison with regular

> beads.

> >

> > As for the energetic effects of other tachyonized products from

> > Advanced Tachyon Technologies, there is quite a lot of diverse

> > research having been done by researchers in different fields,

> > including some very interesting DNA studies by the biophysicist

> Dr.

> > Glen Rein. Much of that research is published in the Tachyon book

> by

> > David Wagner, the inventor of the Tachyonization process and Dr.

> > Gabriel Cousens.

> >

> > Ole

> >

> >

> >

> > --- In

> > , "surajraghavan2002"

> > <suraj_raghavan@h...> wrote:

> > > Elizabeth wrote, "Scientifically, this website appears to be a

> > load

> > > of rubbish. ...And, if there's simply no solid scientific work

> on

> > the

> > > beads, then let's dispense of speaking of them in scientific

> terms

> > > until there is. OTherwise, it just looks like more energetic

> jive

> > > talk such as you see all over the place in half-baked New Age

> > > products and literature, and my sense is, that these beads

> deserve

> > > better than that..."

> > >

> > > Amen! I wasted 4 years at university to get an electrical

> > engineering

> > > degree:-) (i don't do it professionally though) and i can

assure

> > you

> > > that the article is bollocks. You can see the flaws with even a

> > basic

> > > knowledge of electronics. Without getting into jargon, the

> problem

> > > with this article is that it claims that the benefits of

> > Rudraksha's

> > > are due to its electro magnetic properties. As your friend

> pointed

> > > out, these are quantifiable so where are the results? Also,

> > assuming

> > > say the 5 mukhi bead that was tested by Rai's team exhibited a

> > > certain capacitance, what is the guarantee that the 5 mukhi you

> are

> > > wearing would do the same? Which brings me to tachyonisation. I

> > have

> > > major problems with this as well. Here the theory seems to be

> that

> > by

> > > doing a process (tachyonisation) to a bead you can make that

> bead

> > > take on the energetic characteristics of beads with different

> > mukhis.

> > > For this you need to 1) know what the numbers are for the

> various

> > > mukhis (an unknown as far as i can tell, unless Dr. Ramesh or

> > whoever

> > > it is that is marketing this can prove otherwise) 2)prove that

> > these

> > > numbers are uniform within a certain tolerance (that is if you

> can

> > > prove that the 7 mukhi from your tree and that from your

> neighbor's

> > > tree both exhibit the same quantifiable charateristics give or

> take

> > a

> > > microfarad for example) 3)prove that after tachyonisation beads

> > with

> > > different mukhis exhibit the same quantifiable characteristics.

> > > Since to prove 2) and 3) you would first need to establish 1)

> the

> > > theory, IMO, falls flat on its tachyonized face:-)

> > > I love rudrakshas but trying to prove their worth in pseudo

> > > scientific jargon is IMO the big problem.

> > > Suraj

> >

> >

> > Sponsor

> >

> > To send an email to: -

>

> >

> >

> >

> > Terms of

> Service.

> >

> > India Matrimony: Find your partner online.Post your

profile.

> >

> >