to Barbara : ....listen to me.....

[Guest guest]

Thank you for your message, but I do not really understand you. If you are

talking about pure mind Buddhism, I am not interested in pure mind.

 

My Christian friend is a woman, and she helps people because she wants to

serve Jesus. She doesn't have an ulterior motive. I was in the restaurant

with her last week, and someone came up to our table whom we didn't know,

and this person said that she had gifts from God, and one of the gifts was

speaking in tongues, and another was exhortation and another was some sort

of prophesy, and she told my friend that my friend would become either a

missionary or a preacher.

 

Don't worry about me. God looks after me. I am crazy because He made me this

way.

 

Do you have a "Young's Analytical Concordance"? I no longer have one as I

gave mine away, but I have a Cruden's one which says that "There are some 18

or 20 Hebrew words which point to different kinds of prickly shrubs which

are variously rendered in the Authorized Version." Every time I wear my

rudraksha as a forehead mala, I wonder whether Jesus' crown of thorns were

rudraksa. You need a concordance which gives the original

Hebrew/Greek/Aramaic word to trace this; then you must go to the Latin to

check it against the Latin name for rudraksha.

 

Thank you,

 

Barbara

 

 

Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:35 AM

RBSC : to Barbara : ....listen to me.....

 

 

> Barbara ,

>

> " ...Guess I am just paranoid, and there is no need to listen to me.

> I'm a bit nuts..."

>

>

> No ,

>

> not you ,but your mind is ,

>

> as long as you are have not "attained" the "Inner Self state"

> you can not always trust the mind and all its ideas

>

> Does the sun go down ? No

>

> but our eyes ,mind and lack of knowladge makes us belive it

>

> Be the inner witness of the mind and enjoy the inner stillnes and

> happines,( that you already have ) because there is no real end to

> problems/contradictions if you always follow the "mind thinking" info

>

> hoppe you can understand my point and not miss-understand it ,

>

> and this I also recommend to all the members on this club :

>

> we should be more careful before reacting to something ,think it over

> first - because there will be more problems to come - and you can

> count on that ,

>

> if you repeat "things" over and over again it will one day be/feel

> tru , but is it ?

>

> Your "Christian" friend helps people ,and this is what you see , can

> you also see his tru motives for doing that ?

>

> Who are you repeating in you mind ?

>

> because this can not be your real inner knowledge or Wisdom

>

> Yes , men hate women and Yes : man love women

>

> ----

>

>

> ------------------------------

>

> , "Barbara J.

> Spencer" <barbjs@s...> wrote:

> > Dear Cindy,

> >

> > I really do not know whether I have or am evolving spiritually. I

> think,

> > sometimes, I would have evolved spiritually more if I had remained a

> > Christian. My best friend is a Christian, and she is always doing

> things for

> > people. I was a born again Christian at one time, and the problem

> with

> > Hinduism as I see it is that people are always asking God for

> wealth, etc.,

> > and it sort of turns me off; also, I never know what caste I am,

> and I sort

> > of think that I am always an outcaste even though I do Hindu

> devotions, and

> > that sort of bothers me, also. For a long time in history, men said

> that

> > women did not have souls. I'm sorry, but I really do think that men

> hate

> > women, and I don't think that Shiva and Shakti are equal--I think

> that

> > Shakti is more than Shiva. No man loves his equal--they only love

> more than

> > their equals. Because Shiva loves Shakti, this shows that She is

> more than

> > equal to Him. I am His devotee though, but I do not trust His male

> devotees.

> > Guess I am just paranoid, and there is no need to listen to me. I'm

> a bit

> > nuts.

> >

> > Barbara

> >

> > -

> > "Cindy Sullivan" <ganeshee@v...>

> > <>

> > Sunday, November 23, 2003 1:54 PM

> > Re: RBSC : Re: Science Discovers the Physiological Value of

> > Continence :

> >

> >

> > Do you really believe that?

> > Just ask what your heart of heart says.

> > Blessings,

> > Cindy

> >

> > Barbara J. Spencer wrote:

> >

> > >What happens to women who do not have semen then? Does that mean

> that they

> > >do not evolve spiritually?

> > >

> > >Barbara

>

>

>

>

> To send an email to:

 

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>