Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 paNcAsatpitharUpini : Fifty seats. PaNcasat [fifty] : the expression here generally stands for fifty-0ne. Hence Harsadiksita in commenting on the first verse of the sAradAtilaka "His body is eternal bliss, etc" expalins fifty as fifty- one. The fifty-one seats [pithas] are from KAmarUpa to ChAyAchatra. [see Yoginihrdaya for the 51 names, III. 40-46] Therefore in the PithanyAsa which is included in the SadhAnyAsa, the fifty-one pithas are mentioned. The BrahmA. Pr. says, clearly on this point :"Then must be established in order the fifty-one pithas.... Those [pithas] possessed with the order of letters should be established in their [proper] places of letters." The Yoginihrdaya [iII. 39-46] also says, "O beloved one, one should established the pithas in the places of divine letters [mAtrkAs]... These pithas are said to be the forms of letters" Thus by saying that the pithas are the place of letters, it is explained clearly that the pithas are fifty-one. In the commentaries on the above works it is explained that th ealphabet from ! to Ksa is to be established in each place and the nyAsa of the pithas should be performed in each place of them [letters]. The author of the Sundarimahodays says that the pithas are only fifty, having the syllable ksa out of count. This is wrong because the above quotations [from JNAnArnava, etc] regulate the pithas according to the mAtrkAs. BhAskararAya's Commentary Translated into English by R. Ananthakrishna Sastry. ------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 She is of the form of Sabda-Brahma [God as The Word]. The letters of the alphabet, from A to Ksa, which are her pithas [seats] are also Her forms. - Dr. C. Suryanarayana Murthy, Commentary on the Sri Lalita Sahasranama, 1962 , "NMadasamy" <ashwini_puralasamy wrote: > > > paNcAsatpitharUpini : Fifty seats. > > PaNcasat [fifty] : the expression here generally stands for fifty- 0ne. > Hence Harsadiksita in commenting on the first verse of the > sAradAtilaka "His body is eternal bliss, etc" expalins fifty as fifty- > one. > > The fifty-one seats [pithas] are from KAmarUpa to ChAyAchatra. [see > Yoginihrdaya for the 51 names, III. 40-46] Therefore in the PithanyAsa > which is included in the SadhAnyAsa, the fifty-one pithas are > mentioned. The BrahmA. Pr. says, clearly on this point :"Then must be > established in order the fifty-one pithas.... Those [pithas] possessed > with the order of letters should be established in their [proper] > places of letters." The Yoginihrdaya [iII. 39-46] also says, "O > beloved one, one should established the pithas in the places of divine > letters [mAtrkAs]... These pithas are said to be the forms of letters" > Thus by saying that the pithas are the place of letters, it is > explained clearly that the pithas are fifty-one. In the commentaries > on the above works it is explained that th ealphabet from ! to Ksa is > to be established in each place and the nyAsa of the pithas should be > performed in each place of them [letters]. The author of the > Sundarimahodays says that the pithas are only fifty, having the > syllable ksa out of count. This is wrong because the above quotations > [from JNAnArnava, etc] regulate the pithas according to the mAtrkAs. > > > BhAskararAya's Commentary > Translated into English by R. Ananthakrishna Sastry. > ------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.