Guest guest Posted July 6, 2002 Report Share Posted July 6, 2002 Please accept my obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada! We have to understand sastra, guru, and sadhu in a complete way, not by selecting only some aspects. It is true that women in general are classified as sudra because, like sudras, they cannot be independent and because, like sudras, they work as assistants to their male family members. It is also true that women's varna is classified according to the varna of her husband. However, that is only *part* of the picture. Consider (again): "PURPORT The men of the higher classes -- the brahmanas, ksatriyas and vaisyas -- do not beget children in the wombs of lower-class women. Therefore the custom in Vedic society is to examine the horoscopes of a girl and boy being considered for marriage to see whether their combination is suitable. Vedic astrology reveals whether one has been born in the vipra-varna, ksatriya-varna, vaisya-varna or sudra-varna, according to the three qualities of material nature. This must be examined because a marriage between a boy of the vipra-varna and a girl of the sudra-varna is incompatible; married life would be miserable for both husband and wife. Consequently a boy should marry a girl of the same category." >>> Ref. VedaBase => SB 6.2.26 1)Here, Prabhupada refers to boy *and girl* as being in the four varnas. 2)Astrology is given as one means of ascertaining that varna for both of them; hence the girl's varna, or guna, or caste (in this purport, at least, Prabhupada uses the word "varna") cannot be ascertained only or merely from her father's family. Also there are innumerable references to the fact that varna, or guna, or caste, cannot be determined solely by a person's birth. Nowhere is an exception explicity made for women--that a man's qualities can not be determined by birth, but a woman's can. 3)Although there are many places where it is stated that a woman should mold herself after her husband, follow his vows, etc. in the above purport Prabhupada states that married life will be miserable for both husband and wife if they are not compatible before marriage in their varna, or guna, or caste. Why? Obviously it's not so easy for a woman to mold herself to a man who's of a very different nature. Particularly, a marriage between a higher caste woman and lower caste man is not recommended, as it is difficult for a woman to serve a man who is lower. Of course, a determined and dharmic woman will do her best under such a circumstance of fate. 4)The fear that acknowledging that a women have different natures in ways similar to the ways that men have different natures will lead to women having careers out of the home, having excuses to look down on their husbands, and so on, is not a good reason to deny both scripture and obvious fact. We need to figure out ways to understand and apply the scriptures, not deny whatever we fear may be misused. Saying that women are subordinate can be misused, as well, and has been, by those who are abusive. Still, we should preach that women should be subordinate and submissive to their male authorities. I would like to end this discussion. Your servant, Urmila devi dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2002 Report Share Posted July 9, 2002 On 8 Jul 2002, Mrgerald (AT) aol (DOT) com wrote: > Therefore, the shastra informs us of only a single varnashrama system. The > injunctions regarding the mutual distinctions between the four varnas and women > (as well as the subsequent dependence of women' varna identity on that of > their protectors) are very relevant to Vaishnavas in Kali-yuga and cannot be > filtered out under the rationalization of a fictitiously alternative > "daivi-varnashrama" system or neglected because we are of the "bhakti movement" > or "bhagavat-parampara". Women's varna, according to the one and only > varnashrama system of shastra, is a reflection of their protectors' varna. To > be taken seriously, the examples regarding women maintaining a varna status > distinct from their husbands' changes need precedence in shastra. Please accept my obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada! Prabhu, did you receive the text where I quoted the purport where Prabhupada states that if a man and woman of dissimilar varnas (he used the word varna) marry, as *determined by astrology* (not the father's family, though, yes, that would certainly also be considered) that both the girl and boy would be miserable? I also sent a text some time ago where Prabhupada writes of the guna of the boy and girl being determined by astrology (yes, I know that the family and practical observation would also be considered) or again, both would be miserable? Please explain those two purports (and the many statements about not having inter-varna marriage in general, especially where the woman is higher than the man) so that both they *and* the statements about a woman's varna being that of her husband are all harmonized. Please do not attempt such harmonization by saying that a woman's varna/guna/caste is determined by birth family unless you can find clear sastric evidence to support such a conclusion, evidence that also harmonizes with the other evidence. I believe I have already given such an explanation, but perhaps you felt it insufficient in some way. I am surprised that, if you did find it insufficient, you haven't pointed out the defect. Your servant,Urmila devi dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.