Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RE: Reply to Sriman Krishna Kant's points

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

My Dear Vaisnavas,

 

Please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to His Divine Grace Srila Prabhupada.

 

1) Under Sankarsana prabhu's system one is NOT supposed to get

authorized by the GBC, and therefore must be self-certified, and

therefore the word 'thinks' is highly appropriate. We only have his word

for the fact that in the early 80s he was already qualified to act as

Diksa Guru, because HE thought he knew the 'Science of Krishna'. Neither

can he claim he was 'self-effulgent' at that time, for he definitely was

not self-effulgent to the whole GBC or ISKCON in the early 80s.

 

2) Sankarsana prabhu has already stated that the GBC are deviating from

Srila Prabhupada's order by not allowing him since the early 80s to act

as a Diksa Guru even though he knew the 'science of Krishna'. There is

no instruction from Srila Prabhupada stating that we must follow the GBC

even when they are deviating from Srila Prabhupada's order. Thus

Sankarsana prabhu must find another excuse to justify why he deviated

from Srila Prabhupada's order in this regard, and instead chose to

co-operate with a deviant GBC.

 

(Samba Prabhu has already made this false argument more than once -

that we must follow the GBC even they are deviating from Srila

Prabhupada's order - and each time I have asked him to provide a quote

to back up his argument, it has been met with silence.)

 

3) It is nice that Sankarsana prabhu feels he can agree with me. I

simply ask that he remember what it is he has agreed with, and not

suddenly try and fault-find me for doing things which he has already

said he agrees with i.e. sharing our feelings and laughing and crying

with us in regards to the contents of BTP.

 

Thank you,

 

Your servant,

Krishnakant

 

 

 

 

 

Sankarshan Das Adhikari [sda (AT) UltimateSelfRealization (DOT) com]

Sunday, February 15, 2004 8:49 AM

Bhakti Charu Swami; Bir Krishna Goswami; Danavir Goswami (USA);

Jayadvaita Swami; Jayapataka Swami (GBC); Purnacandra (das) ACBSP;

Isvara (das) GGS (Vrindavana - IN); Krishna Priya (dasi) (Amsterdam -

NL); Krishnakant; Mahashakti dasa; Rama Kesava (das) BVTS (Edinburgh -

UK); Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp) (Zurich - CH); Samba (das)

SDG; Sankarshan Das Adhikari; Sravana dasi (Shantipur - NL); Sudama das;

Tripada (das) (Split - HR); Initiations in ISKCON

Reply to Sriman Krishna Kant's points

 

My Dear Vaisnavas,

Please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to His Divine Grace Srila Prabhupada.

 

I didn't say "thinks" they know. Krishna Kant is

putting words into my mouth. The person must actually

know the science of Krishna. It's not actually me

who is saying this is Prabhupada's position. It is

Prabhupada who is saying that it is his position.

 

I waited many years before initiating because Srila

Prabhupada personally told me to obey the GBC. How

can I be blamed for following Srila Prabhupada's

instruction? I am supposed to follow all of his

instructions not just the ones I pick and choose.

 

The fact that I can empathize with Krishna Kant on

certain points is the proof that I am not harboring

any closed-mindedness or prejudice. I am always a

lover of truth wherever I find it. That's why when

Krishna Kant is right I can agree with him and when

he is wrong I can disagree with him.

 

Hoping this meets you in good health,

Always your humble servant,

Sankarshan Das Adhikari

 

====================================================

Contact Information:

Ph: 1-512-835-2121

Mail: ISKCON, 10700 Jonwood Way, Austin, Texas 78753 USA

 

 

 

 

 

irm [irm (AT) iskconirm (DOT) com]

Saturday, February 14, 2004 7:37 PM

'Sankarshan Das Adhikari'; 'Bhakti Charu Swami'; 'Bir Krishna

Goswami'; 'Danavir Goswami (USA)'; 'Jayadvaita Swami'; 'Jayapataka Swami

(GBC)'; 'Purnacandra (das) ACBSP'; 'Initiations in ISKCON'

RE: A mini review of Back to Prabhupada Issue #2

 

 

My Dear Vaisnavas,

Please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to His Divine Grace Srila Prabhupada.

 

 

1) Sankarsana Prabhu claims that the IRM are not following Srila

Prabhupada.

 

Sankarsana Prabhu also claims that anyone who thinks they 'know the

science of Krishna consciousness' is automatically authorized to become

a Diksa Guru in ISKCON.

 

The GBC's position however is that only those individuals who are

authorized by themselves, via receiving the necessary number of votes,

are authorized to become a Diksa Guru in ISKCON.

 

Hence according to Sankarsana prabhu both the GBC and the IRM disagree

with his position which he claims is Srila Prabhupada's position.

 

(He also mentions how he was blocked by the GBC for almost 20 years from

executing what he sees as Srila Prabhupada's order, because they follow

a policy which is not what he claims Srila Prabhupada ordered.)

 

So according to Sankarsana prabhu, the IRM are in good company in not

following Srila Prabhupada!

 

2) Previously Sankarsana prabhu had said the following regarding stories

from BTP:

 

"One very effective propaganda technique that he employs

is to give the example of one ISKCON guru after another

who went astray. I have to admit I share the same disgusted

feelings that Krishna Kant has in this regard. I can also laugh and cry

with him about gurus flying on broomsticks, etc."

(Sankarsana Prabhu, 2/11/2004)

 

Here Sankarsana Prabhu 'admits' he also 'shares' the 'same disgusted

feeling' regarding ISKCON Gurus going astray as me, examples of which

are given in BTP. He himself even quotes one such example of a story

from BTP 1 - Vipramukhya who is featured flying on his broomstick, and

agrees that he can 'also laugh and cry' with us regarding these things.

 

3) He also claims that the IRM by producing this magazine are not

'absorbed in Krishna consciousness'. So here he is making exactly the

SAME 'fault-finding' statement about us, which he claims we are making

about the ISKCON Gurus, even though he claims he is against

'fault-finding'! This position of his is made even more contradictory by

his above statement, where he admits he is happy to 'also laugh and cry'

WITH the IRM regarding the contents of BTP!

 

Thank you,

 

Your servant,

Krishnakant,

Editor, 'Back To Prabhupada'

 

 

 

 

 

Sankarshan Das Adhikari [sda (AT) UltimateSelfRealization (DOT) com]

Sunday, February 15, 2004 3:43 AM

Bhakti Charu Swami; Bir Krishna Goswami; Danavir Goswami (USA);

Jayadvaita Swami; Jayapataka Swami (GBC); Purnacandra (das) ACBSP;

Isvara (das) GGS (Vrindavana - IN); Krishna Priya (dasi) (Amsterdam -

NL); Krishnakant; Mahashakti dasa; Rama Kesava (das) BVTS (Edinburgh -

UK); Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp) (Zurich - CH); Samba (das)

SDG; Sankarshan Das Adhikari; Sravana dasi (Shantipur - NL); Sudama das;

Tripada (das) (Split - HR); Initiations in ISKCON

A mini review of Back to Prabhupada Issue #2

 

My Dear Vaisnavas,

Please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to His Divine Grace Srila Prabhupada.

 

Although I did not request it I just received in the mail from Sudama

Das

issue #2

of "Back to Prabhupada." He is also listed as the publisher. It's

motto is

"Defeating tyranny in the realm of thought." Whereas Back to Godhead

Magazine's

motto is from the scriptures this magazine's motto is not. This

immediately

tells

us something about the difference between Back to Godhead and the "Back

to

Prabhupada"

magazine.

 

The title of the magazine is quite appropriate. ISKCON is already with

Prabhupada.

We never left him, and hence we do not need to get back to Prabhupada.

IRM

on the

other hand has veered very far away from Prabhupada and hence needs to

get

"Back to

Prabhupada." I am hoping and praying that they will heed their own

advice

and get

back to Prabhupada and by giving up their concocted nitwit philosophy.

 

This magazine claims to be "The Magazine of the real Hare Krishna

Movement,"

but we see that this magazine does not promote Krishna consciousness.

The

whole mood of the magazine is very negative. This is not the production

of people who are absorbed in Krishna consciousness. It is the

production

of people who are absorbed in fault finding.

 

Here's what Srila Prabhupada says about fault-finding:

 

"Those who are committing sins like illicit sex, fault-finding, and

unjustified violence

rarely attain spiritual knowledge or realization."

 

Renunciation Through Wisdom 2.6

 

--and

 

vaisnavera guna-grahi, na dekhaye dosa

kaya-mano-vakye kare vaisnava-santosa

 

He (Pandit Haridas) always accepted the good qualities of Vaisnavas and

never found

fault in them. He engaged his heart and soul only to satisfy the

Vaisnavas.

 

PURPORT

It is a qualification of a Vaisnava that he is adosa-darsi: he never

sees

others'

faults. Of course, every human being has both good qualities and faults.

Therefore

it is said, saj-jana gunam icchanti dosam icchanti pamarah: everyone has

a

combination

of faults and glories. But a Vaisnava, a sober man, accepts only a man's

glories and not

his faults, for flies seek sores whereas honeybees seek honey. Haridasa

Pandita never

found fault with a Vaisnava but considered only his good qualities.

 

Caitanya Caritamrita Adi 8.62

 

 

ISKCON Solidarity ki jaya!

 

Hoping this meets you in good health,

Always your humble servant,

Sankarshan Das Adhikari

 

 

 

 

-----------------------

To from this mailing list, send an email to:

Initiations.in.ISKCON-Owner (AT) pamho (DOT) net

 

 

 

 

-----------------------

To from this mailing list, send an email to:

Initiations.in.ISKCON-Owner (AT) pamho (DOT) net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we are on the subject of ignoring, how about this one?

 

> [Plus Samba Prabhu cannot even phrase the question below correctly.

> The disciplic succession does NOT STOP if Srila Prabhupada continues

> as the Guru. By 'loading' the question in this way, Samba Prabhu is

> simply assuming that which needs to be proven.]

 

Here is the proof that the disciplic succession would cease...

 

Predecessor acaryas

|

|

Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura

|

|

His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

|

|

STOP

 

Why keep ignoring it?

 

Does the disciplic succession stop or not?

 

Your servant

Samba das

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Monday, February 16, 2004, at 03:14 pm, Samba (das) SDG wrote:

 

>> [Plus Samba Prabhu cannot even phrase the question below correctly.

>> The disciplic succession does NOT STOP if Srila Prabhupada continues

>> as the Guru. By 'loading' the question in this way, Samba Prabhu is

>> simply assuming that which needs to be proven.]

>

> Here is the proof that the disciplic succession would cease...

>

> Predecessor acaryas

> |

> |

> Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura

> |

> |

> His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

> |

> |

> STOP

>

> Why keep ignoring it?

>

> Does the disciplic succession stop or not?

 

Exactly. Under rtvik-vadi you cannot have a disciplic succession -

parampara - because no-one is succeeding him as guru.

 

Ys., Rama Kesava dasa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...