Guest guest Posted June 8, 2004 Report Share Posted June 8, 2004 Dear Krishna Priya Mataji, PAMHO. AGTSP! > My reply, so you do not longer think we all agree with you is as follows: > > Was your "former and now fallen guru" indeed authorized? Yes. And he is not my former diksa guru, he is my current diksa guru. I am still following his instruction: chant Hare Krishna and support the devotees with your computer programs. > Was he "liberated" at the time of initiating you and has now become > "conditioned" again...or how is it??? He did not have to be liberated, he had to be authorized. Please let Srila Prabhupada judge whether someone is liberated or not. > If Harikesh dasji,along with the other ten "original gurus imitating Srila > Prabhupada" had been truly authorized, how come their very first blunder > was in "thinking" that they were appointed to be "paramahamsa parivrajak > acharyas and ZONAL GURUS" only to tell us years later that "they had been > mistaken"????????? I did not ask him? > Sadly, you and many like you, are extremely happy about these unfortunate > turn of events, Of course I am not happy about these unfortunate turn of events. > I for one do not accept that Harikesh nor anyone of the others were > authorized to be guru by Srila Prabhupada. If Harikesa Swami was not authorized, then Srila Prabhupada wasn't authorized either. (They received the same instruction). In that case we should take initiation from Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur Maharaja. If you don't agree, then please explain me why Srila Prabhupada was authorized but not Harikesa Swami. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.