Guest guest Posted August 1, 2004 Report Share Posted August 1, 2004 In the Gop€la T€pan… Upaniat with the commentaries of Vivevara and Vivan€tha, published by ®r… S€rasvata Gau…y€sana Mission, Calcutta 1975, the verse "eko va… sarva-gaƒ..." appears as Gop€la-p™rva-t€pan… 21. This is the same as 1.21. Best is to refer to this edition (somehwere in your bibliography). There are many different ways in which this Upanishad is numbered. The BBT edition of ®r…mad-Bh€gavatam 10.63.34, claims that "cetana cetan€n€m" is Gop€la Tapan… 1.21. This, however, is not a case of different numbering, but plainly wrong. ys end > > Please accept my humble obeisances. > All glories to Srila Prabhupada! > > > The VedaBase has: eko va… sarva-gaƒ kŠa …yaƒ/ eko 'pi san bahudh€ yo > 'vabh€ti. (Gop€la-t€pan… Upaniad 1.21) > > But the printed edition of the ISO I'm using (3rd edition, 12th printing, > 1993) gives Gop€la-t€pan… Upaniad 1.3.21 as a reference. > > Which one is right? 1.21 or 1.3.21 (or should it be P™rva 3.21?). > > > Thank you very much. > > Hare Krishna. Your humble servant, > Rupa Sanatana Dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.