No authority, simply a disturbance to society

[Guest guest]

Dear Krishna Priya Mataji, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

> > If Srila Prabhupada really introduced the posthumous ritvik system,

> > then I would immediately reject him as a bogus guru.

>

> Would you really?

 

Yes, I am serious.

 

> For unless someone can proof that Srila Prabhupada did instruct this

> "posthumous"ritvik system to stop, we HAVE TO ACCEPT that it remains in

> place.

 

On October 18, 1977 Srila Prabhupada said that he stops initiating.

 

> Yet Srila Prabhupada DID INTRODUCE THE RITVIK SYSTEM WITHOUT GIVING

> EXPLICIT SHASTRIC REFERENCE.

 

If he did that, then he whould be a bogus guru.

 

> My personal observation is that Srila Prabhupada very strongly felt that

> none of his disciples were qualified to completely become Guru in own

> right after he disappeared...

 

You mean he felt that he was a failure and could and will not produce any

pure devotee who could act as diksa guru?

 

> This I read between the letters of Srila Prabhupada's conversations in the

> last days.

 

When did Srila Prabhupada say that we should read between the letters.

 

> It is ridiculous that ISKCON/GBC propose that we have faith in what they

> believe is the right parampara system to be applied in ISKCON, without

> being able to give any guarantee that present and future gurus will not

> fall down.

 

Again, you really mean that Srila Prabhupada could not produce any guru in

ISKCON who does not fall down?

 

ys Ramakanta dasa

 

BTW: In WinCOM you can press Ctrl-W to quote the whole text.