No authority, simply a disturbance to society

[Guest guest]

Dear Krishna Priya Mataji, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

Please do not do any personal attacks!

 

> One point which is often missed by those who quote this 'GURU, SADHU,

> SASTRA' principle, is that if the GURU is bona fide, then his teachings

> and instructions will AUTOMATICALLY be in line with SADHU and SHASTRA.

 

If Srila Prabhupada really introduced the posthumous ritvik system,

then I would immediately reject him as a bogus guru.

 

> Note: when Srila Prabhupada was physically there were his disciples

> constantly asking: where is stated what you are speaking Srila Prabhupada?

 

Whenever Srila Prabhupada introduced something new (e.g. giving brahmana

initiation to mlecchas), he provided shastric refencences that authorize

this change.

 

During ten years Srila Prabhupada said that the disciple becomes the new

guru. Now if after these ten years Srila Prabhupada introduced a change in

that system, then he (not Krishnakant Desai) HAS to provide shastric

references. We do not have to accept it blindly.

 

ys Ramakanta dasa