Guest guest Posted October 25, 2004 Report Share Posted October 25, 2004 Dear Krishna Priya Mataji, PAMHO. AGTSP! > If you are incapbablt to see and understand the extraordinary position of > Srila Prabhupada there is absoulutely no point in trying to argue with you > on this point. You ether recognise the selfmanifest powerful acharya or > you do not...you seem to fit such unfortunate category. Deepak Prabhu recently wrote: >We are not sentimentalists, we must support all our statements with logical >arguments based on evidence from Srila Prabhupada. Please can you now do >this. > It all begins with understanding and desire. if you cant understand, cant > accept Srial Prabhupada is your guru, how will you pray to him to be > accepted and how will you receive any sign? I agree. I wrote something similar: Of course if you are able to communicate with a departed guru as if he is personally present, then you can take personal initiation from him. > is puzzling for me to see how ISKON apologist are considering srila > Prabupada's most legimate Ritvik arrangement to be mayavadi "Impersonal" does not mean "mayavada". For example the four kumaras were impersonalist (before the met Vishnu) but never mayavadis. > FALLDOWN IN ITSELF IS NOT PROOF OF BEING AUTHORISED, ONLY POSSIBLE > INDICATION. Probably you wanted to say: FALLDOWN IN ITSELF IS NOT PROOF OF _NOT_ BEING AUTHORISED, ONLY POSSIBLE INDICATION. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.