Excerpt from Bhagavad Gita As It Is defeating ritvikism A Question

[Guest guest]

Dear Krishna Priya Mataji, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

> With the use of Ritviks, Srila Prabhupada, though physically departed does

> not need to be personally present;

 

Srila Prabhupada was not authorized to break with the tradition of our

sampradaya since Madhvacarya and set up a ritvik system that will last for

9500 years. If the ritvik followers assert that he was, then they must

present an evidence.

 

> How this is compared to Ritvik being Mayavada is still beyong my

> comprehension,

 

I wrote "impersonal". And "impersonal" does not me "mayavada".

 

> > Probably you wanted to say: FALLDOWN IN ITSELF IS NOT PROOF OF _NOT_

> > BEING AUTHORISED, ONLY POSSIBLE INDICATION.

>

> Yes. That is indeed what I meant. Not falling down is in itself also not

> proof of being authorised....

 

Then we agree: The falldowns of some of the gurus is not the proof that

Srila Prabhupada did not authorize any disciple.

 

ys Ramakanta dasa