Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

can someone give sastric and sadhu validations for ritvikism

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

> Do you think even Mpd is interested in this anymore.NO! its just a sheild

> for him, to not follow the GBC and authority of his Guru.Anyone who is

> mislead by MPd is getting cheated because he/she wants to get cheated,

> there is no bases to this whole issue. You also need not break your head

> with it anymore unless you have some doubts. If you have some doubt then

> please come over and we shall discuss and i shall try my best to clear

> them.

 

That's a good point. Ritvikism is just a smoke-screen Mpd uses to hide

behind so he undisturbed can usurp ISKCON funds for his own purposes. And we

are speaking crores of rupees here, that he has taken complete control over.

The ritvik issue is not at all a philosophical issue. How can it be, when

there is no evidence for it in guru, sadhu and sastra?

 

The only ones who have blown it up to be so, was first Nityananda in his

Vedic Village Review, who in his envy did it with the sole purpose of

destroying the GBC, and now it is Mpd in Bangalore who adds fuel to the

ritvik smolders, and keeps doing it, even long after they have died down. He

is using he ritvik issue to divert the attention of the general mass of

devotees away from the fact, that he is busy stealing ISKCON's property.

 

Thus a lot of confused and uninformed devotees have been misled into

thinking there is some kind of philosophical schism going on in ISKCON, or

some use the ritvik issue (which is not an issue) simply to vent their own

frustrations on the GBC. Many things may be wrong in ISKCON and the GBC, but

do we really think we can help correct these wrongs by inventing bogus

philosophies? That doesn't make any sense. And if one cannot understand that

the ritvik idea is bogus and that TFO is a load of incoherent garbage, then

there is not much that can be done. But lets at least relocate the ritvik

issue to where it belongs - the garbage can.

 

Hare Krishna

 

ys, jdd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear MCD Prabhu

 

PAMHO. AGTSP.

 

>can someone also add Madhu Pandit Prabhu and Chanchalapati Prabhu from

>ISKCON Blore and get them to also convince us on this philosophy? Also

>please add Krishna Kant Prabhu, Sattvik Prabhu from Calcutta and other

>Ritvik adherents to please enlighten us on this issue.

 

The philosophy that Srila Prabhupada continues as the current spiritual

master in ISKCON is comprehensively explained in "The Final Order" (TFO), as

you well know. All you have to do is read it and in this way your desire to

become enlightened about Srila Prabhupada's instructions on ritvik

initiations will be fulfilled.

 

Contrary to Jahnu Prabhu's uneducated critique of TFO that it is "incoherent

garbage", ISKCON's own leading academic advisor Prof. Kim Knott stated in

the Foreword to TFO:

 

"It raises important theological questions concerning spiritual authority

and its transmission, the relationship of the disciple and Krishna's

representative, the guru, and the proper objects of devotional worship...

the profound issues it raises demand consideration at all levels. Every

devotee has a real stake in the matter."

 

So if Jahnu would like to tell the academic community that they are so

unprofessional as to recommend a work of "incoherent garbage", I'm sure they

will heed this advice from such a recognised scholar as himself.

 

It should also be noted that TFO, which was written **specifically in

response** to the GBC paper "Gurus and Initiations in ISKCON" (GII),

resulted last year in the GBC withdrawing its own GII paper, admitting in

the process that it both "stretches the truth" and is full of "lies". That

doesn't sound like a ringing endorsement for the GBC's philosophy on

guru-tattva, does it?

 

>also why is it that instead of discussing and convincing opposing

>views....they believe in throwing people out physically ...and use force

>rather than logic and arguement...is this what Srila Prabhupad taught

>us....

 

This is a rather sad attempt to twist the facts. I seem to recall devotees

being beaten and physically thrown out of Srila Prabhupada's temples by the

GBC for simply advocating Srila Prabhupada's final signed directive of July

9th 1977. Yes, I'm sure I'm right...

 

----------

ASIAN AGE: April 28, 2001

"Seventy two ISKCON Mayapur devotees were arrested by the Shakespeare Sarani

Police on charges of rowdyism on Saturday morning. They have been kept in

Police custody. Sources say that more than 250 ISKCON Mayapur devotees

barged into the ISKCON Revival Movement office on Albert Road on Friday

evening and tried to assault IRM President Adridharana Das who, they

claimed, is no more the president. Adridharana Das had filed a case against

70 ISKCON Mayapur Gurus who claimed they were the chief leaders of the

ISKCON Movement. Das said ISKCON only had one leader - Srila Prabhupada.

This has been the major bone of contention between the two factions. They

assaulted the 15 IRM devotees who lived inside the temple and held them

hostage for the entire night. They again assaulted the IRM devotees on

Saturday night."

 

THE TIMES OF INDIA: 15 October 2001

"Police arrested three persons from Iskcon temple in Mayapur and seized the

attendence register, in relation to a blast near the Temple on Saturday

which killed a man & injured two brothers. according to Police, Babu Ghose

was making crude bombs near the temple compound when one of them went off

accidentaly killing him on the spot & injuring two others. Initially, the

temple authorities had denied any connection with the de-ceased or the

injured but on Sunday admitted that Ghose was a group D staff."

 

(other reports not included due to space limitations).

 

 

>if a philosophy is right...then its practitioners will have exemplary

>behaviour...

 

Quite so.

 

>..and did not physically assault or cause to assault Chand Kazi...he also

>did not file cases against any devotee or non devotee to harass them....

 

Unfortunately, it is too late now for Suresvara Das, the Calcutta devotee

who took his own life after being framed in what turned out to be a false

rape allegation in which certain ISKCON members were implicated.

 

>Let Truth Prevail..and let cowards and wrongdoers beware and keep away

 

Well you can't have the truth by twisting facts, or by framing and beating

devotees, or by promoting a philosophy which you later secretly admit was a

pack of lies (GBC paper above-mentioned).

 

So if MCD Prabhu, you would like to continue our philosophical discussion

which you somewhat unceremoniously abandoned mid-stream in October 2004, I

would be happy to continue. (Please note that I can physically only discuss

with one person at a time, namely MCD if he wishes, and will therefore not

be responding to any other posters on this Forum - unless MCD wishes to

nominate someone else to take his place. Thank you).

 

Your servant,

Deepak

 

_______________

It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!

http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead of being in a fighting mood we should simply all accept

all the instructions of Srila Prabhupada. This will solve

everything. We don't need anyone to redefine Srila Prabhupada's

instructions because his books are crystal clear.

 

 

Krishnapriya dd [Krishnapriya.dd (AT) pamho (DOT) net]

Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:25 AM

Anukulya Keshava (das) JPS (Bangalore - IN); ashesha govinda das(iskcon

blore); Deepak Vohra; Jahnu (Dvipa das JPS) (Mayapur - IN); K.S. Mahesh

Cc: Bhanu Swami (Madras - IN); Kavicandra Swami (GBC Japan); Jasomatinandan

(das) ACBSP (Gujarat - IN); Krsnadasa Kaviraja (das) ACBSP (Toronto - CA);

Mukunda Datta (das) ACBSP (BBT Govardhan); Acintya Caitanya (das) JPS

(Bangalore - IN); Dayaram (das) JPS (Mayapur - IN); Narahari (das) JPS

(Bangalore - IN); Ratnavali (dd) JPS (JPS Office Mayapur - IN); Sarvajna

Krishna(das)JPS(Chennai,Moscow Temple Project); Tusti Mohan Krsna (das) JPS

(JPS Off. MYR-IN); Vaikuntha Pati (das) JPS (JPS Office Mayapur - IN);

Vibhav Krishna (das) JPS (Bangalore - IN); Vidvan Gauranga (das) JPS

(Mayapur - IN); Vishal Gauranga (das) JPS (Bangalore - IN);

mantraguru9 ; gangreg ; ard (AT) iskconbangalore (DOT) org;

vyasapuja (AT) iskconbangalore (DOT) org; Initiations in ISKCON

can someone give sastric and sadhu validations for ritvikism

 

 

<<<<And if one cannot understand that

the ritvik idea is bogus and that TFO is a load of incoherent garbage, then

there is not much that can be done. But lets at least relocate the ritvik

issue to where it belongs - the garbage can.>>>>>

 

>From Deepak's reply to MCD, which is also applicable to the above:

 

***

The philosophy that Srila Prabhupada continues as the current spiritual

master in ISKCON is comprehensively explained in "The Final Order" (TFO), as

you well know. All you have to do is read it and in this way your desire to

become enlightened about Srila Prabhupada's instructions on ritvik

initiations will be fulfilled.

 

Contrary to Jahnu Prabhu's uneducated critique of TFO that it is "incoherent

garbage", ISKCON's own leading academic advisor Prof. Kim Knott stated in

the Foreword to TFO:

 

"It raises important theological questions concerning spiritual authority

and its transmission, the relationship of the disciple and Krishna's

representative, the guru, and the proper objects of devotional worship...

the profound issues it raises demand consideration at all levels. Every

devotee has a real stake in the matter."

 

So if Jahnu would like to tell the academic community that they are so

unprofessional as to recommend a work of "incoherent garbage", I'm sure they

will heed this advice from such a recognised scholar as himself.

 

It should also be noted that TFO, which was written **specifically in

response** to the GBC paper "Gurus and Initiations in ISKCON" (GII),

resulted last year in the GBC withdrawing its own GII paper, admitting in

the process that it both "stretches the truth" and is full of "lies". That

doesn't sound like a ringing endorsement for the GBC's philosophy on

guru-tattva, does it?************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Deepak Prabhuji

PAMHO

 

As per SP 3 things are essential

1. Guru

2. Sadhu

3. Sastra

 

Regarding the ritvik issue

1. Guru. - there is a divide on this. Some say SP said this others say he

did not

 

2. Sadhu - no evidence given so far that i know of, to support ritvikism

 

3. Sastra -no evidence given so far that i know of, to support ritvikism

 

Kindly give these.

 

Also include Satvik Pr, Adhridarana Pr, Krishnakant Pr etc also.

 

regarding other aspects in the mail below...pls find my comments below..

 

 

ys

mcd

 

 

Dear MCD Prabhu

 

PAMHO. AGTSP.

 

 

"It raises important theological questions concerning spiritual authority

and its transmission, the relationship of the disciple and Krishna's

representative, the guru, and the proper objects of devotional worship...

the profound issues it raises demand consideration at all levels. Every

devotee has a real stake in the matter."

 

my(MCD's) comments: "he mentions consideration...does he endorse ritvikism

and say its correct? does he recommend this as the way forward....we are in

effect following his advise in this forum by taking it seriously and

discussing it...since we all have a real stake in it."

 

 

>also why is it that instead of discussing and convincing opposing

>views....they believe in throwing people out physically ...and use force

>rather than logic and arguement...is this what Srila Prabhupad taught

>us....

 

This is a rather sad attempt to twist the facts. I seem to recall devotees

being beaten and physically thrown out of Srila Prabhupada's temples by the

GBC for simply advocating Srila Prabhupada's final signed directive of July

9th 1977. Yes, I'm sure I'm right...

 

----------

ASIAN AGE: April 28, 2001

"Seventy two ISKCON Mayapur devotees were arrested by the Shakespeare Sarani

Police on charges of rowdyism on Saturday morning. They have been kept in

Police custody. Sources say that more than 250 ISKCON Mayapur devotees

barged into the ISKCON Revival Movement office on Albert Road on Friday

evening and tried to assault IRM President Adridharana Das who, they

claimed, is no more the president. Adridharana Das had filed a case against

70 ISKCON Mayapur Gurus who claimed they were the chief leaders of the

ISKCON Movement. Das said ISKCON only had one leader - Srila Prabhupada.

This has been the major bone of contention between the two factions. They

assaulted the 15 IRM devotees who lived inside the temple and held them

hostage for the entire night. They again assaulted the IRM devotees on

Saturday night."

 

THE TIMES OF INDIA: 15 October 2001

"Police arrested three persons from Iskcon temple in Mayapur and seized the

attendence register, in relation to a blast near the Temple on Saturday

which killed a man & injured two brothers. according to Police, Babu Ghose

was making crude bombs near the temple compound when one of them went off

accidentaly killing him on the spot & injuring two others. Initially, the

temple authorities had denied any connection with the de-ceased or the

injured but on Sunday admitted that Ghose was a group D staff."

 

(other reports not included due to space limitations).

----------

--

 

 

my(MCD's) comments:" these newspaper reports indicate that 70 ISKCON Mayapur

devotees assaulted 15 ISKCON Calcutta devotees...should i understand that

only one side assaulted the other...or were the 15 strong enough physically

to withstand assault and endure so many days of assault.

 

neverthless Vaishnava aparad should be avoided at all costs...since ours is

a peaceful movement....

 

 

>if a philosophy is right...then its practitioners will have exemplary

>behaviour...

 

Quite so.

 

>..and did not physically assault or cause to assault Chand Kazi...he also

>did not file cases against any devotee or non devotee to harass them....

 

Unfortunately, it is too late now for Suresvara Das, the Calcutta devotee

who took his own life after being framed in what turned out to be a false

rape allegation in which certain ISKCON members were implicated.

 

 

 

my(MCD's) comments:" i am sorry i am unaware of Suresvara Prabhu...and the

circumstances under which he committed suicide...however it is wrong for one

to commit suicide..it is violence...self violence is also wrong...

one's body and soul belong to Krishna and taking one's life is wrong...and

probably reflects maturity in KC and lack of understanding of these

concepts....however i cannot fathom the conditions he was in ..and whether

he was right in such situations...however i am quite confident many

Vaishnavas have been through tough times.....its hard to imagine justifying

suicide even then.

 

so i guess blame is due to the one who commits suicide certainly...regarding

false cases if any...i am unaware..and if one falsely troubles a

vaishnava...it certainly is wrong"

 

 

>Let Truth Prevail..and let cowards and wrongdoers beware and keep away

 

Well you can't have the truth by twisting facts, or by framing and beating

devotees, or by promoting a philosophy which you later secretly admit was a

pack of lies (GBC paper above-mentioned).

 

So if MCD Prabhu, you would like to continue our philosophical discussion

which you somewhat unceremoniously abandoned mid-stream in October 2004, I

would be happy to continue. (Please note that I can physically only discuss

with one person at a time, namely MCD if he wishes, and will therefore not

be responding to any other posters on this Forum - unless MCD wishes to

nominate someone else to take his place. Thank you).

 

my(MCD's) comments:" I am sorry for not being involved for sometime...i had

the good fortune of doing some service during this time...which kept me

busy...

i have heard about cases of devotees being asked to leave ISKCON Blore

because they had differing views with MPP...is this right...dont we allow

Mayavadis and karmis to visit our temples..without security guards..why this

bad behaviour to devotees...shouldn't the ritviks be showing exemplary

Vaishnava behavior to the rest of ISKCON??

 

you have not touched on many of these issues at all? please answer these

also.

 

why have so many brahmacharis...i am told of the original 70 or so...only 4

or 5 still in ISKCON Bangalore...please give me the correct facts on this...

i have heard that Varada Krishna Prabhu was beaten in ISKCON Blore..and some

false case put on him also..pls clarify this also..

 

also i heard that if a person is disliked..then in the night...his luggage

is placed out of the ashram and he is asked to leave.....just because he may

have a contrary opinion....did SP throw devotees out of ISKCON like this??

did he encourage his TPs to remove people by force if they disagreed with

them only verbally...though continuing service...without breaking any

regulative principles...please give quotes to prove this..

 

suppose I am an inmate of the ritvik temple ISKCON Blore and I have a

grievance against the TP or Management...say i dont agree with something..or

i feel i am being badly treated etc...i am sure we have enough such

instances during SP's time...where devotees used to approach SP for these

things....and later the GBC....

in case of ISKCON Blore..whom can i approach....who has authority over MPP

and his management...does he accept anybody else's authority....is there a

body of individuals for such matters?

Pls answer these doubts of mine also...pls dont forget to address

them....also you have not replied or commented on many of the issues i

raised in my previous letter..kindly read them and address these issues

also.."

 

ys

mcd""

 

Your servant,

Deepak

 

_______________

It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!

http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear MCd Prabhuji

 

PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

>As per SP 3 things are essential

>1. Guru

>2. Sadhu

>3. Sastra

 

 

Agreed. And since SP is a fully authorized, bona fide spiritual master,

whatever he instructs us to do is AUTOMATICALLY in line with sadhu and

sastra:

 

“Sadhu, sastra and guru. Guru means who follows the sastra and sadhu. SO

THERE ARE THREE, THE SAME." (SP Lecture 30/11/76)

 

“Sadhu sastra: saintly persons and scriptures, two things, and with

spiritual master, three, three parallel lines, who accept the sadhu and the

scripture. Sadhu confirms the scriptures and spiritual master accept the

scripture. Simple process. SO THEY ARE NOT IN DISAGREEMENT...Saintly person

means who confirms the Vedic injunction, who accepts. And scripture means

what is accepted by the saintly person. And spiritual master means who

follows the scriptures. SO THINGS EQUAL TO THE SAME THING ARE EQUAL TO ONE

ANOTHER. THIS IS AXIOMATIC TRUTH.” (SP lecture, October 18, 1968)

 

Please also note that the SASTRA you are supposed to read are the books of

Srila Prabhupada, who is also the GURU (and indeed sadhu too). So whatever

SP states in his books, letters, conversations and classes is ALREADY

sastric. This is just obvious, and is the case with all the bona fide

members of our parampara:

 

"The statements of Thakura Bhaktivinoda ARE AS GOOD AS SCRIPTURES because he

is a liberated person." (Letter to Janaradan, 18/4/68)

 

 

So moving on to your statement:

 

 

>Regarding the ritvik issue

>1. Guru. - there is a divide on this. Some say SP said this others say >he

>did not

 

I had already sent you, as you requested, Srila Prabhupada’s final signed

directive of July 9th 1977, where he appointed ritviks to initiate disciples

on his behalf. Do you accept that the July 9 letter is an authoritative

order from SP – YES or NO?

 

[Please note that a recent assertion on this forum that we cannot place any

authority on the July 9th letter because SP did not write it is completely

bogus, as HH Jayadvaita Swami would confirm:

 

"Its authority is beyond question [...] Clearly, this letter establishes a

ritvik-guru system." (JS, 'Where the ritvik People are Wrong' 1996)

 

“A final concern about letters might be that some letters Srila Prabhupada

personally wrote or dictated, others he signed after a secretary composed

them, and still others a secretary wrote and signed and Srila Prabhupada

countersigned as “approved.” Such a concern, however, should have little

impact. ALL SUCH LETTERS HAVE AUTHORITY. SRILA PRABHUPÄDA'S SIGNATURE SHOWS

HIS CLEAR ENDORSEMENT OF WHATEVER THE LETTER MIGHT SAY.” (Jayadvaita Swami,

‘Levels of Authority’, 2003)]

 

So now, given that the words of SP are non-different from guru and sastra,

most reasonable people would accept that this letter indeed establishes the

ritvik system, and is therefore sastric. The only question then left for

you to answer is whether this ritvik system should have been terminated on

Srila Prabhupada’s departure, and replaced by two new systems, neither of

which were authorized anywhere by SP (namely, the Zonal Acarya system, and

the 2/3 majority vote multi-guru system). Since there is no mention in the

letter itself that the ritvik system should be terminated, and then

subsequently replaced by 2 different guru systems not once mentioned by SP,

one naturally wonders WHY it was terminated. SP also gave many other

institutional instructions to be carried out after his physical departure –

such as chanting 16 rounds, performing sankirtan, offering him his yearly

Vyasa Puja etc. – yet no one has argued that we should have stopped

following these instructions because SP has physically departed.

 

 

>my(MCD's) comments (about Prof. Kim Knott’s quote): "he mentions

> >consideration...does he endorse ritvikism

>and say its correct? does he recommend this as the way forward....we >are

>in

>effect following his advise in this forum by taking it seriously and

>discussing it...since we all have a real stake in it."

 

Well, some people are clearly NOT interested in seriously discussing SP’s

instructions on ritvik as published in TFO, such as Jahnu, who thinks TFO is

“incoherent garbage”; and who also thinks that any discussion on ritvik

should be consigned to the garbage can.

 

Regarding your comments on ISKCON Bangalore, since I have never been there,

nor met Madhu Pandit nor any of the other Bangalore devotees, I cannot

comment. But as far as devotees being thrown out of ISKCON temples, in the

UK they are certainly being banned all the time by the temple authorities;

and for good measure they are being beaten black and blue too (even a young

girl has not been exempt from such treatment). So much for philosophical

discussion.

 

Your servant,

Deepak

 

_______________

Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Deepak Prabhuji

pamho

agtgm

agtsp

 

Sp prided the fact that all that he said was as per sadhu and

sastra...usually it was his practice to mention such quotes in his books...

so we must look for such quotes from SP in his books to support ritvikism

and also in the books of the other acharyas..since they are the sadhus who

endorsed these...

 

i discovered in one conversation..SP calls his disciples pure devotees..have

you seen this one..kindly check for it in folio..

 

you have again not answered my doubts on how i can under this ritvik system

settle issues in the Bangalore temple..and many other questions..

 

if HH Jayadvaita Maharaj..a sadhu accepts the letter ..as you mentioned

below..i cannot obviously refute it.....

 

kindly answer my other doubts..its two letters now..wherein my doubts are

not cleared...things are just building up...

 

if you cannot answer these questions then kindly say so..because then to me

there are many areas which the ritvik system cannot address...and the

current GBC system seems to have a mechanism to resolve issues in temples

atleast.....so if the ritvik system cannot have a system to democratically

resolve issues..then it turns into a dictatorship in each temple..is this

what SP wanted?

 

and as i said earleir and you accepted...if ritviks want to impress the rest

of the community about the truth of their stance..then one good way is also

by exemplary actions..and good vaishnava behavior...

so isnt the onus on ritviks all over the world to also try and look into the

affairs of the Bangalore temple...which i gather is the largest and most

popular ritvik temple worldwide.

 

 

 

ys

mcd

 

 

Dear MCd Prabhuji

 

PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

>As per SP 3 things are essential

>1. Guru

>2. Sadhu

>3. Sastra

 

 

Agreed. And since SP is a fully authorized, bona fide spiritual master,

whatever he instructs us to do is AUTOMATICALLY in line with sadhu and

sastra:

 

“Sadhu, sastra and guru. Guru means who follows the sastra and sadhu. SO

THERE ARE THREE, THE SAME." (SP Lecture 30/11/76)

 

“Sadhu sastra: saintly persons and scriptures, two things, and with

spiritual master, three, three parallel lines, who accept the sadhu and the

scripture. Sadhu confirms the scriptures and spiritual master accept the

scripture. Simple process. SO THEY ARE NOT IN DISAGREEMENT...Saintly person

means who confirms the Vedic injunction, who accepts. And scripture means

what is accepted by the saintly person. And spiritual master means who

follows the scriptures. SO THINGS EQUAL TO THE SAME THING ARE EQUAL TO ONE

ANOTHER. THIS IS AXIOMATIC TRUTH.” (SP lecture, October 18, 1968)

 

Please also note that the SASTRA you are supposed to read are the books of

Srila Prabhupada, who is also the GURU (and indeed sadhu too). So whatever

SP states in his books, letters, conversations and classes is ALREADY

sastric. This is just obvious, and is the case with all the bona fide

members of our parampara:

 

"The statements of Thakura Bhaktivinoda ARE AS GOOD AS SCRIPTURES because he

is a liberated person." (Letter to Janaradan, 18/4/68)

 

 

So moving on to your statement:

 

 

>Regarding the ritvik issue

>1. Guru. - there is a divide on this. Some say SP said this others say >he

>did not

 

I had already sent you, as you requested, Srila Prabhupada’s final signed

directive of July 9th 1977, where he appointed ritviks to initiate disciples

on his behalf. Do you accept that the July 9 letter is an authoritative

order from SP – YES or NO?

 

[Please note that a recent assertion on this forum that we cannot place any

authority on the July 9th letter because SP did not write it is completely

bogus, as HH Jayadvaita Swami would confirm:

 

"Its authority is beyond question [...] Clearly, this letter establishes a

ritvik-guru system." (JS, 'Where the ritvik People are Wrong' 1996)

 

“A final concern about letters might be that some letters Srila Prabhupada

personally wrote or dictated, others he signed after a secretary composed

them, and still others a secretary wrote and signed and Srila Prabhupada

countersigned as “approved.” Such a concern, however, should have little

impact. ALL SUCH LETTERS HAVE AUTHORITY. SRILA PRABHUPÄDA'S SIGNATURE SHOWS

HIS CLEAR ENDORSEMENT OF WHATEVER THE LETTER MIGHT SAY.” (Jayadvaita Swami,

‘Levels of Authority’, 2003)]

 

So now, given that the words of SP are non-different from guru and sastra,

most reasonable people would accept that this letter indeed establishes the

ritvik system, and is therefore sastric. The only question then left for

you to answer is whether this ritvik system should have been terminated on

Srila Prabhupada’s departure, and replaced by two new systems, neither of

which were authorized anywhere by SP (namely, the Zonal Acarya system, and

the 2/3 majority vote multi-guru system). Since there is no mention in the

letter itself that the ritvik system should be terminated, and then

subsequently replaced by 2 different guru systems not once mentioned by SP,

one naturally wonders WHY it was terminated. SP also gave many other

institutional instructions to be carried out after his physical departure –

such as chanting 16 rounds, performing sankirtan, offering him his yearly

Vyasa Puja etc. – yet no one has argued that we should have stopped

following these instructions because SP has physically departed.

 

 

>my(MCD's) comments (about Prof. Kim Knott’s quote): "he mentions

> >consideration...does he endorse ritvikism

>and say its correct? does he recommend this as the way forward....we >are

>in

>effect following his advise in this forum by taking it seriously and

>discussing it...since we all have a real stake in it."

 

Well, some people are clearly NOT interested in seriously discussing SP’s

instructions on ritvik as published in TFO, such as Jahnu, who thinks TFO is

“incoherent garbage”; and who also thinks that any discussion on ritvik

should be consigned to the garbage can.

 

Regarding your comments on ISKCON Bangalore, since I have never been there,

nor met Madhu Pandit nor any of the other Bangalore devotees, I cannot

comment. But as far as devotees being thrown out of ISKCON temples, in the

UK they are certainly being banned all the time by the temple authorities;

and for good measure they are being beaten black and blue too (even a young

girl has not been exempt from such treatment). So much for philosophical

discussion.

 

Your servant,

Deepak

 

_______________

Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

>if HH Jayadvaita Maharaj..a sadhu accepts the letter ..as you

>mentioned below..i cannot obviously refute it.....

 

For clarification:

 

I accept that the July 9th letter is a letter Srila Prabhupdaa

approved, as shown by his having initialed it.

 

I reject that the letter is Srila Prabhupada's "final order" about how

initiations should be conducted after his departure (a subject the

letter never mentions).

 

I feel abused by those who mention my "approval" of the July 9th

letter as though it somehow indicates I support a doctrine they know I

reject for being groundless, perverse, and insulting to what Srila

Prabhupada taught.

 

(Please note: I have not read the letter to which K.S. Mahesh is

replying, so I am not trying to finger whoever wrote it. My comment

above is meant for whomever the shoe fits.)

 

To my knowledge, the last time Srila Prabhupada explicitly addressed

the question of how initiations would go on after his physical

departure was on May 28, 1977.

 

To see what question the letter of July 9th was meant to answer, one

may consult Srila Prabhupada's conversation with Tamal Krsna Goswami

on July 7th, two days earlier.

 

Hare Krsna.

 

Hoping this finds you in good health,

 

Your servant,

Jayadvaita Swami

 

 

-------------------

www.krishna.com/jas

-------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Jayadvaita Maharaja

 

PAMHO. AGTSP.

 

>I accept that the July 9th letter is a letter Srila Prabhupdaa

>approved, as shown by his having initialed it.

 

Which is all I was pointing out to Jahnu, who said that since Srila Prabhupada

did not write or compose the July 9th letter, it therefore carries no

authority. But clearly, you agree that since Srila Prabhupada's signature

appears on the letter, then it DOES carry authority (or at least it did until

November 14th/15th 1977, when it ceased to be applied in ISKCON).

 

>I reject that the letter is Srila Prabhupada's "final order" about how

>initiations should be conducted after his departure (a subject the

>letter never mentions).

 

Since the letter never mentions Srila Prabhupada's departure (but is only

about initiations "henceforward"), then why was it terminated upon SP's

departure?

 

>I feel abused by those who mention my "approval" of the July 9th

>letter as though it somehow indicates I support a doctrine they know I

>reject for being groundless, perverse, and insulting to what Srila

>Prabhupada taught.

 

I think everyone knows how you feel about the doctrine that the July 9th

directive is applicable for the lifetime of ISKCON; whereas you believe that

it could only have been applicable between July 9th 1977 and November

14th/15th 1977 (a time period, which you agree, is not even mentioned in the

letter). Your "approval" of the letter was only mentioned in the context of

it being authorised by SP, a fact which Jahnu and others contest.

 

Others would say that the doctrine of electing diksa gurus by a 2/3 voting

majority is also "groundless, perverse, and insulting to what Srila Prabhupada

taught" (just like the Zonal Acarya system, in which the 11 ritviks named were

very happy to use the July 9th letter to metamorphose themselves into

fully-fledged diksa gurus). Neither system is mentioned anywhere by SP.

 

>To my knowledge, the last time Srila Prabhupada explicitly addressed

>the question of how initiations would go on after his physical

>departure was on May 28, 1977.

 

This is the conversation where Satsvarupa M. asks SP:

 

"Then our next question concerns initiations in the future, particularly at

that time when you are no longer with us. We want to know how first and second

initiation(s) would be conducted."

 

To which SP replies:

 

"Yes. I shall recommend some of you. After this is settled up. I shall

recommend some of you to act as officiating acarya(s)...ritvik"

 

This "recommendation" for "officiating acarya...ritvik", for the time period

"in the future, particularly at that time when you are no longer with us" was

then formalised in the July 9th 1977 letter.

 

Your servant,

Deepak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...