Guest guest Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 Dear Krishna Priya Mataji, PAMHO. AGTSP! > Now, as early as in 1968, Srila Prabhupada said the following: > > Yes, I am the Spiritual Master of this institution, > and ALL the members of the Society, they're supposed > to be MY disciples. This argument is as silly as following argument. So let's dump it. "When you look at the list of names (disciplic succession) at the end of the introduction to the Bhagavad-gita, you will see that there is no name listed after Srila Prabhupada's. So you have the evidence right there in Srila Prabhupada's book (which is the law book for the next ten thousend years) that none of Srila Prabhupada's disciples are initiating gurus and that Srila Prabhupada is the only initiating guru in ISKCON." If you are still convinced of your argument, then please note that Srila Prabhupada said "I am" and not "I will be". > This has been explaine in detail and in full by Krishnakant in "The Final > Order", which you can download from the site: www.iskconirm.com---- Srila Prabhupada several times said that we should compare guru with sadhu and sastra. He never said that we should read Krishnakant's paper. Krishnakant is not authorized by Srila Prabhupada to explain us his instructions. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.