Guest guest Posted February 7, 2005 Report Share Posted February 7, 2005 Dear Deepak Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > The truth, as shown above, is that you actually amended YOUR statements to > arrive at the statements in your proof, but you originally claimed it was > Krishnakant's statements that you amended. Your mistake is now caught and > documented above in black and white, and faced with such clear-cut > evidence, it is understandable you will not want to defend what you wrote > here and instead simply dodge the issue. What now? Are you able to refute proof #1 or not? I claim you cannot. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.