Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 > This opens another view. Still I think "Prabhupada" is best. Let me > explain. When subject will be well defined, without appearant > contradictions, by our Srila Prabhupada, then we are happy. But in case of > contradictions we may need to search also for opinion of Bhaktisiddhanta > and Bhaktivinoda and more. We will be strictly studying from our Srila > Prabhupada, but we may relay on previous Srila Prabhupada's too, as is > common in ISKCON. So, if I stretch my thoughts a bit, with "Prabhupada" we > speak of whole parampara, through the teachings of our Srila Prabhupada. Yes, good point. Srila Prabhupada is a " Prabhupada" since he perfectly represents the other Prabhupada's headed by Sukadeva, 6 Goswamis, Guruparampara. We should serve Prabhupada through our Guru, and through SP all the previous acaryas. > Technical part.... > Basically, there will be two conferences. First is for discussions in > order to formulate conclusions. This will be the biggest part of our work, > everything will be happening here. So, this one could be "Prabhupada > Siddhanta Study Group (Discussions & Conclusions)", as per Hari Sauri > prabhu's proposal. > > And second will be for members, who will contribute with writing essays, > and for web page technical things. Almost nothing will be happening here, > just proofreading of essays, minor suggestions... (I don't know the word. > editorial?) The name could be "Prabhupada Siddhanta Study Group > (editorial)" Is editorial correctly used? > Please reply with corrections for names of both conferences. If you all > agree, I will change the names, and we can slowly move in our new "room". Your servant Damana Krishna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.