Guest guest Posted June 12, 2005 Report Share Posted June 12, 2005 > So why did Tamil Krsna Goswami's disciples and others build the opulent > sannyasi & bramachari ashram at Govadharn I wonder? Although this seems to me to be a rather foolish comparison, may I suggest you address it to those devotees you are referring to at Govardhan, rather than implying in a public forum that they are "eating and sitting" like the sahajiyas Srila Prabhupada refers to? That would be the intelligent course of action, wouldn't you say? That may not have been your intention, but it looks a little that way when you go public instead of making a submissive enquiry to those involved. They're all easy enough to find, and all of them have an address on PAMHO: HH Kesava Bharati Goswami (who, when he's not travelling and preaching, works with the BBT, translating the writings of the six goswamis of Vrindavan); or His Grace Gopiparanadhana prabhu, who also translates the writings of the six goswamis (they both worked on the 3 volume "Srimad Bhagavatamrita," by Srila Sanatana Goswami), and who also teaches at the college that has been recently set up to teach Sanskrit and study the Srimad Bhagavatam and other literatures, all with the intention of training devotees to continue the long Vaisnava tradition of translating sacred texts and distributing them throughout the world; or several other devotees you might find in PAMHO's address book under "Govardhan". I'm sure they're well equipped to answer any queries you have, and to explain to you how translating these great works doesn't reduce them to sahajiyas who are eating and sitting, though I'm quite sure you never intended to imply that. BTW, I've been to Govardhan, and I'd hardly describe it as "opulent." It has nice gardens. But I recall seeing it in 1993 (I think it was) when it was originally given to HH Tamal (not Tamil, incidentally) Krishna Goswami by the King--I can't really recall the details of that, so I'm reluctant to say much, but his disciples definitely didn't build it, nor did "others" (by that I assume you mean ISKCON devotees?). However, I do recall it was quite a wreck of a place, totally uninhabitable, and hardly what one would call a 'palace.' It had no plumbing, nothing--crumbling walls, a real wreck. It's certainly been renovated so that it is inhabitable, but "opulent" is a misnomer. Your servant Braja Sevaki devi dasi > > Ys Arjunanatha dasa > > > At 10:56 12/06/2005, Radha Krishna Nambiar wrote: > > > > >August 14 > > > > > >Guru-krpa Maharaja was thinking of purchasing some > >land here in Vrndavana for building a sannyasi asrama. > >I asked His Divine Grace about this plan. He replied, > >"sannyasi asrama is not a good idea. This is > >sahajiya's idea-eating and sitting. There are > >different types of sahajiyas, but they are all > >rejected. Our men should actively preach, just like > >Hamsaduta Maharaja is doing. We don't want to > >encourage idle sitting, solitary bhajana. The > >sahajiyas, they manufacture so many stories about how > >the best pious activity is to feed the saintly persons > >in Vrndavana. And they are the only saintly persons. > >They eat and sit and gossip. --- is also sahajiya; > >therefore, he mentions Ramakrishna. --- [another > >Vrindaban resident] is sahajiya number one. Simply mix > >with him to take some service from him. At the same > >time, be very careful that he may not exploit. In > >Vrndavana, ninety percent are sahajiya. And sahajiyas > >are rejected by Bhaktivinoda." > > > >- From the TKG's Diary by HH Tamal Krishna Goswami > >Maharaj > > > -- > > > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.6 - Release 08/06/2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.