Guest guest Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 Pamho. AGTSP. Its interesting that in Vedic culture someone who took sanyasa was only paying his obeisances to his mother not the father. Certainly the mother is on the same position as Guru, from the respect we would give, although not neccesarily we would take her instruction as on the same level- saksat harih. I am amazed how one can react as feeling offeded when addressed as mother. We can remmember the story how Arjuna saw Urvasi as her mother and she feeled offended. So I dont think its a good idea to feel offended. I think we should greatly focus that its glorious for a woman to be like universal mother like Sita, Mother Jahnava who cooked for all vaishnavas and served them with own hands. Although a guru she had motherly affection for all. So it is glorious to address her as Jahnava Ma. Maybe we can fight for the concept that woman have their rights. As there could be some black points in our Society history. Sure they have, but should we try to create woman who are man. The first thing what impressed me in SP teaching is to see the woman as respectful mother. I was always disgusted how my friends looked on woman just as object for their enjoyment and then rejected. Is the meaning of Prabhu, Swami and Mother really so different. But it may have some importance that we develop a Society of motherly love and love for the Mothers. YHS DKD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.