Guest guest Posted August 16, 2005 Report Share Posted August 16, 2005 >...soon thereafter the Gauòéya published a scorching analysis of why >Çréla Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté differed with the ideas of >gauräìga-nägarés, and especially with Haridas Goswami's flavor of the >gauräìga-nägaré deviation: > >1) Gauräìga-nägarés imagine themselves to have the sentiment of gopés >toward Lord Caitanya. . . . This >attempt of the gauräìga-nägarés to be gaura-bhogés (enjoyers of >Gauräìga) is ever rejected by authentic gaura-bhaktas (servants of >Gauräìga). > >2) Gauräìga-nägarés accept guruship by seminal succession, which was >never the teaching or policy of Çré Caitanya or His devotees. > >3) Caitanya Mahäprabhu and His devotees recognized as Gauòéyas only >those who purely and strictly followed the authorized path. . . . > >(end of list) > >Is it correct to place a period at the end of list items 1 and 2? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.