Srila Prabhupada as an authorized diksa guru but none of his

[Guest guest]

Ramakant prabhu.

 

Pamho. AgtSP.

 

 

--- "Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp) (Zurich -

CH)" <Ramakanta.HKS (AT) pamho (DOT) net> wrote:

 

> Dear Madhusudana Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

>, then why do

> you accept Srila Prabhupada as an authorized diksa

> guru but none of his

> disciples?

 

 

Because Srila Prabhupada says he was

ordered/authorized by his guru to be a diksa guru.

Srila Prabhupada is an uttama adhikari (beyond

tama-guna) free from the 4 defects.

 

 

There is NO acceptable evidence that Srila Prabhupada

authorized any of his disciples to be diksa guru. We

do have acceptable (written-documented) evidence that

he wanted his disciples to be his ritvik

representatives.

 

His disciples who are so keen to replace Srila

Prabhupada as diksa guru in ISKCON are NOT free from

the 4 DEFECTS. (proof-Why don't you get Shankershan to

put it in writting that he is a maha-bhagavat?)

 

*Maha-bhagavata*-srestho brahmano vai gurur nrnam

sarvesam eva lokanam asau pujyo yatha harih

maha-kula-prasuto' pi sarva-yajnesu *diksitah*

sahasra-sakhadhya yi ca na guruh syad avaisnavah

 

"The guru must be situated on the topmost platform of

devotional service. There are three classes of

devotees, and the guru must be accepted from the

topmost class." (C.c. Madhya, 24.330, purport)

 

If you can prove with documented evidence that Srila

Prabhupada authorized any or all his disciples to be

diksa gurus - then I for one would have nothing to

argue with you, on this issue. Since Srila Prabhupada

would be saying that such a disciple was a maha-bhagavat.

 

Learn the truth about the ISKCON guru hoax

ISKCON Revival Movement - http://www.iskconirm.com

 

 

 

 

____

Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

http://store./redcross-donate3/