please try and be equipoised

[Guest guest]

Ramakanta prabhu.

 

Pamho. AgtSP.

 

 

--- "Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp) (Zurich -

CH)" <Ramakanta.HKS (AT) pamho (DOT) net> wrote:

 

> Dear Madhusudana Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> > When Srila Prabhupada was physicaly present how

> many of his 10,000

> > disciples were able to ask him questions?

>

> Everyone could send him a letter.

 

 

They still do. On Vyasapuja day.

 

 

 

> > How many of them even physical even met Srila

> Prabhupada?

>

> What do you mean by "physically meet"?

 

experienced his vapu

 

 

> > "So utilise whatever time you find to make a

> thorough study of my books.

> > Then ALL your questions will be answered." (Letter

> to Upendra, 7/1/76)

 

> Okay, then please answer following question by

> referring to Srila

> Prabhupada's books only: When was the ritvik system

> to be stopped?

 

 

Why do you accept the instructions in this letter to

Upendra, but you QUESTION the instructions in the

letter to Omkara Dasi, after all BOTH are personal

letters.

As mentioned before, please try and be equipoised.

Since it was NOT meant to be stopped, your question is

an oxymoron.

 

 

 

> > Also how do you know that Srila Prabhupada did not

> receive his

> > authorization in writing?

>

> I think we all agree that Srila Prabhupada is an

> authorized diksa guru. So

> what is the purpose of your question?

 

 

The purpose of the question was to find out if you had

any information on the nature of Srila Prabhupada's

authorization which may have been unknown to me.

 

 

> > This is just more nonsense. If you remember you

> were debating with Deepak

> > in January NOT me!

>

> In January you were debating with me. From January

> 16 to 20 you sent me

> about 7 replies. Don't you remember?

 

 

 

I remember Deepak defeated you.

 

 

>

> > Again try and remember correctly I asked you to

> provide a quote from Srila

> > Prabhupada which states that, "All my letters are

> private mail and the

> > instruction within are ONLY between myself and the

> recipient".

>

> I am not aware of such a statement. But that does

> not mean that the opposite

> it true, unless you provide a quote from Srila

> Prabhupada which states that,

> "Some of my letters are public mail and the

> instruction withing are for

> everyone".

 

 

As mentioned before - you are quite happy to quote

from Srila Prabhupada's letters when it suits YOUR

agenda.

 

 

> > Please demonstrate in what way I have failed to

> answer your question.

>

> I asked:

>

> Why do you accept Srila Prabhupada as an authorized

> diksa guru although, as

> you wrote on August 16, Srila Prabhupada never

> disclosed how he got the

> order, we probably will never know the answer to how

> he got the

> authorization? (Note that I wrote "authorized diksa

> guru").

>

> You answered:

>

> I accept Srila Prabhupada as a bona-fide spiritual

> master because he was

> authorized by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta.

>

> "Bona-fide spiritual master" could also mean

> "bona-fide siksa guru".

>

 

Of course it could, but would be incorrect within the

context of the discussion.

 

Learn the truth about the ISKCON guru hoax

ISKCON Revival Movement - http://www.iskconirm.com