Srila Prabhupada is asked to speak on rasa-lila

[Guest guest]

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > > Nityananda, Gadadhara, or Srivas Pandit? Do you seriously think

> > > > > > that being a devotee for 30 years qualifies one to speak about

> > > > > > these topics, when the Panca-tattva didn't? What a bizarre

> > > > > > concept.

> > > > > >

> > > > > I don't know. Thats why I'm asking. Maybe Caitanya Mahaprabhu had

> > > > > some other specific reason to not discuss rasa-lila with Panca

> > > > > tattva members. Maybe some historical/sociological reasons.

> > > >

> > > > "Maybe" this, "maybe" that. What's the point of such useless

> > > > speculation?

> > >

> > > OK! Than you give us something supstantial, please!

> >

> > Some more substantial speculation, you mean? No.

 

> Something substantial from Sastra!

 

There was a quote provided from sastra, but it seems some aren't happy with

that and want to speculate about what Lord Caitanya "might" have meant, or

what He "maybe" was thinking in terms of historical/sociological reasons.

That's not discussing sastra, it's speculation. And my question remains,

what is the point. Just read what Srila Prabhupada says, it's pretty

straightforward.