Srila Prabhupada is asked to speak on rasa-lila

[Guest guest]

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > Nityananda, Gadadhara, or Srivas Pandit? Do you seriously

> > > > > > > think that being a devotee for 30 years qualifies one to

> > > > > > > speak about these topics, when the Panca-tattva didn't?

> > > > > > > What a bizarre concept.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > I don't know. Thats why I'm asking. Maybe Caitanya

> > > > > > Mahaprabhu had some other specific reason to not discuss

> > > > > > rasa-lila with Panca tattva members. Maybe some

> > > > > > historical/sociological reasons.

> > > > >

> > > > > "Maybe" this, "maybe" that. What's the point of such useless

> > > > > speculation?

> > > >

> > > > OK! Than you give us something supstantial, please!

> > >

> > > Some more substantial speculation, you mean? No.

>

> > Something substantial from Sastra!

>

> There was a quote provided from sastra, but it seems some aren't

> happy with that and want to speculate about what Lord Caitanya

> "might" have meant, or what He "maybe" was thinking in terms of

> historical/sociological reasons. That's not discussing sastra, it's

> speculation. And my question remains, what is the point. Just read

> what Srila Prabhupada says, it's pretty straightforward.

 

Is it possible to repost any sastric evidence on why Lord Caitanya would

not discuss rasa lila with all members of Panca tattva but only with

some. I didn't get it.

 

ys ccd