Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Posted by Yaduraja on Nov 15, 2005:

 

dear Ramakanta prabhu,

PAMHO, AGTSP,

 

I need to clarify something. You say:

 

"I agree that Srila Prabhupada was the sole initiator (initiating his own

disciple), but "he established himself as the sole initiator" is unproven"

 

So you agree that Srila Prabhupada was the sole initiator, but argue that it

is unproven that it was he who established himself in this position. Is this

what you are saying?

If yes then:

 

1) Did someone or something else establish him in that position which you

agree he held?

2) If so who or what?

 

thanks

ys

yadu