Guest guest Posted December 2, 2005 Report Share Posted December 2, 2005 > > Considering the fact that 100% of the funds for the workers involved > > was coming from the UNDP, the SMVS director at the time felt he was > > obliged to cooperate with their request. > > > Yes, this is the problem when you become obliged to the karmis. > Simply for some money we have to sell out our principles and become > directly involved in the sinful acts of the karmis. > > > As of March, the UNDP program is complete and so SMVS is no longer > > involved in condom distribution in any way. > > This is not much consolation. What you are really saying here is > that if the UNDP program was not complete, we would still be involved in > their illicit activities. The cessation of the program in March isn't a > plus for us in any way. What happens the next time the UN or some other > organization wants to involve the SMVS in sinful acts? Will the managers > again feel obliged to participate? > > What we should be asking ourselves is what would Srila Prabhupada > say about such activity? Probably a lot less than he'd have to say about his own disciples and members doing the same thing. Besides, if you can think of a way to convince the locals to follow the four regulative principles, you'd probably qualify for sainthood. Srila Prabhupada also said every effort was covered with fault; focusing on the percentage of fault detracts from the percentage of good that SMVS does. Your servant Braja Sevaki dd ¾ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.