Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

You have not answered following question:

 

By looking at the grammar, the meaning of the words, etc. you concluded some

meaning of my statement. But this is not what I meant. You misunderstood me.

You did a similar thing with Srila Prabhupada's statements. So what is the

guarantee that you correctly understood Srila Prabhupada?

 

 

> If we combine statements 1) and 2), using your own words, we get:

>

> Srila Prabhupada set up in 1966 that he was the sole Diksa Guru for ISKCON

> from 1966 to 1977.

 

1) and 2) are not my words. You wrote them on November 29, 2005.

 

Also if you combine these two statements, you have to combine them by the

word "and", nothing else:

 

1) Srila Prabhupada was the sole diksa guru for ISKCON from 1966 to 1977.

AND

2) Srila Prabhupada set things up that way in 1966.

 

Statement 1) describes a status quo and 2) describes an activity. It is

unproven that the status quo 1) was caused by the activity 2). But your

combined statement says exactly that.

 

Remember that Srila Prabhupada said that he is the founder acarya of ISKCON.

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa