Vedic definition of atheism

[Guest guest]

> Yes, I read that text some years ago. I can see you have added some new

> things. It's very good, and I can see that you have used quite a lot from

> William Lane Craig, is'nt it? There is one or two things which I think can

> be adjusted, for example the things about offensive and defensive atheism.

> I don't think there's any reason to conclude that defensive atheism have

> redefined the definition of atheism. But I will get back to that in future

> postings.

 

That's a good point. There is no need to buy into the atheists' own

definitions of themselves. Atheism pops it head up under any excuse. It's

the principle of atheism we have to look for. It is unproductive to discuss

atheism in terms of their own speculative definitions. The bottom line is

that atheism is defined by ignorance, so it is ignorance we have to attack

and destroy. We don't attack their definitions because then we are drawn

into debate on their terms. I have been debating atheist on the internet

since 96, and I can tell you for sure that their main aim is to waste your

time.

 

ys, jdd

 

PS. Thanks, Bhakta Jan for your good wishes. Braja says hello back. Will you

go to Korsnæs this year? I will be going in the summer, so maybe I'll see

you there.