Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 > That's a good point. There is no need to buy into the atheists' own > definitions of themselves. I don't know who made those definitions. Could be theistic philosophers as well. After all, atheism comes only after theism, which it negates. If there is no idea of God, there can be no negation of it. Shouldn't the existence of God be taken as an axiom? Otherwise the debate is endless. > so it is ignorance we have to attack and destroy. Sure. But let's remember that while ignorance can be removed by an argument, only mercy of the Lord turns one into a devotee. > We don't attack their definitions because then we are drawn into > debate on their terms. I have been debating atheist on the internet > since 96, and I can tell you for sure that their main aim is to > waste your time. Therefore I focus on preaching to open-minded people who use their ears and brain more often. > PS. Thanks, Bhakta Jan for your good wishes. Braja says hello back. > Will you go to Korsnæs this year? I will be going in the summer, so > maybe I'll see you there. No sure since we can do everything online. Let's see. ys Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.