Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> I was trying to find a form of words you would agree with so we could move

> the debate forward.

 

We already did that once. We agreed on a new wording of your point a). But

then you still wrote, "the status quo established by Srila Prabhupada for

the institution of ISKCON" (Dec 11, 2005). So this time I want to make sure

that you do not again present your unproven claim that Srila Prabhupada did

something with the (intended) effect that he was the sole diksa guru for

ISKCON.

 

 

> If you do not want to move forward then I shall return to explaining why

> you previously contradicted yourself, and how your explanations about how

> you did not contradict yourself do not make any sense so far as the

> English language are concerned.

 

It seems that you identify me with my body and the words that my body

produces. If that is the case, then I have shocking news for you: I am not

this body.

 

 

> After we have dealt with that I shall then explain why our position is

> proven.

 

"I shall then ..."? Srila Prabhupada calls this a postdated check.

 

 

> So you can now decide whether to accept the form of words I have offered

> as a compromise, and thus move forward to point b), or whether you want me

> to once again go back to the self-contradiction issue.

 

Let us finish a point before we jump to other points. But do you really

think that you can prove your position by pointing out contradictions in my

words? Really?

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa