Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 Washington Post *Canada Confirms Case of Mad Cow Disease* By ROB GILLIES The Associated Press Monday, January 23, 2006; 5:58 PM TORONTO -- A cow from an Alberta farm has tested positive for mad cow disease, officials said Monday, raising fears for a beef industry still struggling to recover from a U.S. decision in 2003 to ban cattle imports. Dr. Brian Evans, Canada's chief veterinary officer, said the disease was found in a 6-year-old animal that did not enter the human food or animal-feed systems. The positive test could be a blow to Canadian ranchers who were hard hit after the United States banned Canadian cattle imports in May 2003 following the country's first case of mad cow disease. The U.S. border reopened in July to Canadian cattle younger than 30 months. U.S. officials said the latest case will not prompt a similar ban on Canadian beef imports. "I am confident in the safety of beef and in the safeguards we and our approved beef trading partners have in place to protect our food supply," U.S. Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns said in a statement. Canadian officials and ranchers were worried, however, about the ramifications of the latest case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease, a degenerative cattle nerve illness linked to the rare and fatal human nerve disorder, variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. Industry officials said the cow's age meant it could have contracted the disease by eating feed left over after a 1997 ban on the use of cattle parts in feed. Evans said an extensive investigation is underway. He said the experiences of other countries show that very small amounts of feed purchased before the ban can remain or be retained on farms and lead to infection many years later. "The fact that this animal would have been infected after the 1997 introduction of our feed ban is notable, but it is also consistent with the experiences observed around the world where BSE has been detected and where feed bans have been implemented," Evans said. Stan Eby, president of the 90,000-member Canadian Cattlemen's Association, said a minuscule amount of pre-1997 feed could be responsible for the latest case. But it's more common for animal feed to be used right away, according to the feed industry. "Normally, feed is stored a limited amount of time, once it gets to the farm, and is consumed rather quickly," said Randy Gordon, spokesman for the U.S. National Grain and Feed Association. "We don't know the particulars on this." An investigation in Britain suggested that some cases there resulted from feed residue on bins that had not been cleaned since before the United Kingdom banned cattle remains in cattle feed. Eby said Canada has tested 87,000 cattle and that four cases of mad cow disease have been found in Canada since May 2003. Another cow exported to the United States also tested positive. Canadian beef recently returned to some supermarket shelves in Tokyo following the lifting of a two-year ban on imports. Japanese officials agreed to allow beef from North America back into the marketplace _ provided it came from animals younger than 21 months. Entry into Japan is considered key to the long-term recovery plan of Canada's battered beef industry, which lost $5.7 billion in the scare. Cattle officials hope Pacific Rim countries will help reduce their reliance on the U.S. market, which consumes the vast majority of Canada's beef exports. More than 150 people have died of the disease, most in the United Kingdom, where there was an outbreak in the 1980s and 1990s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.