Guest guest Posted February 2, 2006 Report Share Posted February 2, 2006 > >OK, taking that one step further: I don't believe in your theory that > >nothing exists until I can prove it to you, so until you prove your > >theory to me as being valid, it doesn't exist for me, so we have nothing > >to discuss. > > That's was a good one Well thought! >It's not "thought," it's "logic," Logic has to be thought. "Well thought" means "thought according with the laws of logic." > So the conclusion of our analysis is > that the proof demands a qualified audience. >I am not convinced that he meant arguing with them on internet >or in random spaces. He was more in favor of the organized and scientific >efforts of the Bhaktivedanta Institute for the educated atheists, Sure, I have the same opinion. However, I think you have to confront them if you want to learn their way of arguing. But when you have learned that, you should onnly use it in forums were the innocent listens. Ys, AKD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.