Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

To avoid wasting time, let us first agree what is to be proven.

 

On Nov 17, 2005 you posted following statement:

 

"Srila Prabhupada set himself up, deliberately, in the position of the sole

diksa guru for ISKCON in 1966."

 

This describes an activity done by Srila Prabhupada that started earliest on

Jan 1, 1966 and ended latest on Dec 31, 1966. Before this activity started,

Srila Prabhupada was not the sole diksa guru for ISKCON. And after it ended,

he was.

 

Do you agree?

 

As you confirmed, Srila Prabhupada did everything deliberately. Therefore it

was not required to say that he set himself up deliberately. Still you wrote

"deliberately" and even emphasized it by inserting commas. Therefore

"deliberately" can only refer to "in the position of the sole diksa guru for

ISKCON".

 

Do you agree? If not, then please either remove "deliberately" from your

statement, or write it before "set himself up" to make it clear that it

refers to "set himself up" and not to "in the position of the sole diksa

guru for ISKCON".

 

Then please tell me which one of your 11 points describes the activity as

described above and thus proves your claim.

 

Also please note that none of following is a proof:

- I agreed with something.

- You saw contradictions in my words.

- If A, then B. B. Therefore, A.

 

ys Ramakanta dasa