Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > You have accused me of speculating and then refuse to explain how. Why > make such accusations if you are not prepared to prove them? I already explained it shortly and I am prepared to explain it more. But two different discussions at the same time are confusing. Let us finish a point before we jump to other points. So please write that your latest claim (quoted below) is unproven and that eventually you may prove it later. Then I will happily discuss 'speculation' with you. > And then you have the audacity to ask me to prove whatever whimsical thing > pops into your head ... I just quoted your latest claim and asked you to prove it. If you think that following claim is whimsical, then that's fine with me. On Jan 19, 2006 you wrote: > But you can only be the ‘sole diksa guru’ for an institution if you have > already set things up like that. On Feb 08, 2006 you wrote: > > Do you accept that Srila Prabhupada was already the sole diksa guru for > > ISKCON before he conducted the first initiation ceremony in ISKCON? > > Oh yes of course. Of course, at any time you can give up, drop out of the debate, and leave your claims unproven. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.