Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 >God can prove He doesn't exist, of course, if He wants to. He does it all >the time to the atheists. But the atheists cannot prove God doesn't exist. >Just because God can prove He doesn't exist doesn't make Him an atheist. >Only God can prove he doesn't exist, and if He can prove that, it means He >must exist. How can He prove something, if He doesn't exis? And if He can >prove that He doesn't exist, that means he exists, and if He exists how can >He be an atheist? >As usual whatever the arguments atheists come up with are less intelligent >and requires ignorance to accept. It would be more intelligent to argue, >that if God can do anything He can also be an atheist. And He can. When God >wants to be an atheist He sends Lord Shiva as Shankara to preach atheism. >ys, jdd Thank you Jahnu Prabhu! I was just thinking, that if ALL contradictions exist in harmony in God, then His 100% existence and His 100% non-existence must also exist in harmony in Him. Then to say that He doesn't exist or that He exist are both only half truths, or? I guess the devotees then prefers to emphazise His existence while admitting that His non-existence is also there, while the atheists only acknowledge His non-existence, which is why they are at fault. This acintya-shakti of Krishnas makes it very difficult to reason about Him The concept God no doubt leads to different contradictions, but that would also be expexted since Krishna trancendental to logic, and if He wasn't then He would be limited. What do you think? Ys, AKD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.