Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Posted by Yaduraja on Feb 20, 2006:

 

Dear Ramakanta prabhu,

PAMHO, AGTSP,

You wrote:

 

> As a proof I would accept for example a statement by Srila Prabhupada

> saying this.

 

But as you said before your acceptance of a proof does not mean anything

either:

 

> Even if admitted that point a) has been proven, that would not mean that

> is has been proven.

(Ramakanta das)

 

I mean, you accept Harikesa as your diksa guru but there is no statement

from Srila Prabhupada that 'Harikesa shall be a diksa guru in ISKCON', so

you obviously have your own special system for determining what you think is

proven. You accept a diksa guru who denounces the very concept of gury!! So

whatever 'system' you have for determing what is proven I must admit eludes

me completely. And since you have already said that your acceptance of a

proof proves nothing then what on earth is the point in carrying on?

 

Also please note that I am only addressing allegations and contradictions

you have made in this debate. If you do not want your statements

systematically dealt with then I suggest you refrain from posting them in

the first place.

 

Fortunately for me you seem to be the only living soul on the planet who has

a problem with the idea that Srila Prabhupada established himself as the

diksa guru for ISKCON in 1966, so I dare say I shall be able to live with

the idea that you do not consider it proven.

 

As I said I am happy to wait till you answer my points regarding my alleged

'speculation'. If you do not intend to do so we can lock down this debate

and save it for posterity. You can then decalre to the world whatever it is

you think you have achieved. Run it up the flagpole and see who salutes it!

 

Just let me know your final decision so I can inform the moderator.

best wishes

ys

Yadu