Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

On Feb 8, 2006 you wrote:

> Most people in the world do not accept ISKCON’s gurus are proven to be

> authorised representatives of God, yet clearly you do.

 

Then on Feb 12, 2006 you wrote:

> If he is your diksa guru then you must accept he was authorised to act as

> such and thus you must accept all ISKCON gurus authorised since they were

> all authorised to act as God's representative's on earth via the identical

> process and justification.

 

You said "they were all authorised to act as God's representative's on

earth". But you also said "Srila Prabhupada remains the diksa guru for

ISKCON". This is a contradiction. Please explain.

 

What 'identical process' do you mean? The authorization to be diksa-guru

must come from Srila Prabhupada. And I don't know if all ISKCON gurus

received that authorization from Srila Prabhupada. Therefore I cannot

clearly agree that ISKCON’s gurus are proven to be authorized

representatives of God. Therefore your claim that I clearly agree is

incorrect.

 

ys Ramakanta dasa