Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

I do not accept ISKCON’s gurus are proven to be authorized representatives

of God. If you conclude the opposite, then your conclusion is wrong. You

should have written "It seems you accept ..." or "I understood that you

accept ..." or similar. Then I would not have objected. But "yet clearly you

do" is definitely wrong.

 

 

> So in fact, according to our philosophy, you have never been initiated by

> a bone fide diksa guru since you have sensibly cut off that relationship

> due to his falling down and preaching rubbish. Based on your clarification

> this means that Harikesa’s latest philosophy is now no longer relevant for

> discussion.

>

> So if you agree with the above I shall move on to the next unfair

> accusation you made against me.

 

I agree that according to your philosophy you can conclude it. I retract any

accusations that you consider unfair.

 

 

Now it might be a good idea to attempt to prove your claim that before Srila

Prabhupada conducted the first initiation ceremony in ISKCON he had already

set things up to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON. Otherwise the other

readers of this discussion might conclude that you are unable to prove it.

What do you think?

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa