Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> ‘Logical fallacy’ means ‘wrong’ in a debate does it not? You can hardly

> think it was 'right' if you think it was a fallacy can you?

 

By a logical fallacy you may come to a correct conclusion. For example, "the

streets are wet, therefore it rained" is a logical fallacy. But if it indeed

rained, then the conclusion is correct. (This is my final statement on this

subject. I don't want to make a big issue.)

 

 

> if you do not dispute my point above, I will be coming to your

> self-contradiction next. And that is something you will need to explain

> before we can go on to your latest argument.

 

Does this mean that unless I explain something, you cannot prove your claim

that before Srila Prabhupada conducted the first initiation ceremony in

ISKCON he had already set things up to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON?

Otherwise, why did you write "before we can"?

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa