Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Posted by Yaduraja on Feb 28, 2006:

 

Dear Ramakanta Prabhu,

PAMHO, AGTSP,

You complained:

 

> And please don't twist my words. I did not claim that the conclusion you

> drew from those facts was wrong. Rather, I wrote that it is a logical

> fallacy.

(Ramakanta Feb 09, 2006 - 11:56 AM)

 

But if my conclusion was a ‘logical fallacy’ as you assert then it would be

‘wrong’ in the context of a debate, so why are you so upset? How am I

‘twisting your words’ if the meaning amounts to the same thing?

 

‘Logical fallacy’ means ‘wrong’ in a debate does it not? You can hardly

think it was 'right' if you think it was a fallacy can you?

 

Taken together with the other points I have just dealt with it seems you

were making a big issue out of nothing of any real substance to distract

everyone from your self-contradiction.

 

But your distractive arguments have not worked since, if you do not dispute

my point above, I will be coming to your self-contradiction next. And that

is something you will need to explain before we can go on to your latest

argument.

 

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu