Guest guest Posted March 25, 2006 Report Share Posted March 25, 2006 Posted by Yaduraja on Mar 24, 2006: Dear Ramakanta prabhu, PAMHO AGTSP, It is often quite difficult to pin down exactly what your position is, for example whether the word ‘if’ is your proposition or somehow meant to represent my position, especially when you twice refused to confirm whether you accepted my summary of your three main arguments. But I must say I find the following assertion quite remarkable: > I do not accept any statement that contains any trace of intention to be > the SOLE diksa guru. Srila Prabhupada was the sole diksa guru, but there > is no proof that he intended to be the SOLE diksa guru. The direct implication of the above assertion is that: even though Srila Prabhupada acted for year after year as the sole diksa guru for ISKCON, starting in 1966 right through till 1977, this was completely unintentional on his part. So you are back to your Robinson Crusoe philosophy it seems. It was all some sort of accident, like a shipwreck! How do you know Srila Prabhupada did not intend to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON even though he was for several years? Do you have any evidence for this astonishing assertion? Best wishes Ys Yadu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.