Guest guest Posted April 15, 2006 Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > But our whole debate is based on the fact that your think our position is > not proven, for which you have presented numerous arguments which I have > had to address. I just explained why what you wrote is not a proof of your stated position. > Therefore please explain how, in the context of this debate, I can avoid > discussing your position? Okay, but then please quote my stated position that you want to discuss. I presented YOUR position as YOU explained it and then asked you to prove it. Just that. I did not present my position. > If Srila Prabhupada did not want to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON then > why do you think he... > > “made himself recognized and accepted as the sole diksa guru for ISKCON in > 1966” You don't have to know what I think in order to prove your stated position. Your proof should be independent of what I think. > Your position is contradictory. Please quote my stated position that you think is contradictory. > Why would Srila Prabhupada make himself recognised and accepted as the > very thing you claim there is no proof he wanted to be? I don't know that because I cannot read Srila Prabhupada's mind. Here is again my challenge: Please present some evidence that Srila Prabhupada wanted to be the SOLE diksa guru for ISKCON (the deliberate outcome described by your statement), or admit that your statement is unproven. (Please note the emphasis on "SOLE"). ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.