Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Posted by Yaduraja on Apr 24, 2006:

 

dear Ramakanta prabhu,

PAMHO, AGTSP,

You wrote:

 

> Please explain why "in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted several diksa gurus

> for ISKCON" is speculation, but not "in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted one

> diksa guru for ISKCON". Both statements are not based on what Srila

> Prabhupada said. They are only speculations about what Srila Prabhupada

> might have been desiring while he asked his godbrothers to help him in

> ISKCON, or made himself recognized and accepted as the sole diksa guru for

> ISKCON, respectively.

 

Why are you speculating that Srila Prabhupada wanted to introduce extra

diksa gurus into ISKCON?

 

Whereas you have already agreed it is proven that Srila Prabhupada made

himself accepted and recognised as the sole diksa guru for ISKCON.

 

The former is speculation, the second is supported by my 11 arguments in

which Srila Prabhupada most certainly said and did things that very

definitely made him accepted and recognised as the sole diksa guru for

ISKCON as you have already agreed is PROVEN.

 

You also curiously confuse the disobedience and madness of a disciple with

Srila Prabhupada’s deliberate efforts to save him.

 

So once again, since you apparently agree that Srila Prabhupada always acted

deliberately, and that we do not need to read his mind to know this since it

is within the very definition of the term ‘Krishna Consciousness’, do you

therefore agree that when...

 

“Srila Prabhupada made himself recognised and accepted as the sole diksa

guru for ISKCON in 1966” (a fact you agree is proven)

 

he did so deliberately? I shall just keep asking this till you answer.

Everyone can see how you are simply avoiding answering.

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu