Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Posted by Yaduraja on Apr 26, 2006:

 

Dear Ramakanta Prabhu,

PAMHO. AGTSP!

You wrote:

 

> You only showed that the act was deliberate.

 

So you do agree that the act of making himself recognised and accepted as

the sole diksa guru for ISKCON in 1966 was deliberate.

 

If it was deliberate, which you admit I have shown, then it must have been

something Srila Prabhupada wanted to do. There is no hint of specualtion

from my side here.

 

The deliberate act is described by the verb 'made' and the outcome of that

deliberate act was recognition and acceptance as the sole diksa guru for

ISKCON.

 

The sentence that you say is proven (your re-worded point a) contains both

the verb or the act (made), and the outcome of that deliberate

act(recognition and acceptance as the sole diksa guru). That is all I am

claiming so what is the problem?

 

Actually the problem may be your English again. Why not take a course or

something, maybe with a better grasp you would agree with us completely.

If this is all clear now we can go back to point b) so I can answer your

Madhavacarya argument.

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu