Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

I asked you: "Do you claim that in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted to be the

sole diksa guru for ISKCON?" And you answered:

 

> YES.

 

Well, then please prove it.

 

Since it is impossible to know what a pure Vaisnava wanted unless he said

it, I accept as a proof only a statement by Srila Prabhupada saying that he

wanted to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON. I do not accept a proof based

on mind reading (he did X, therefore he wanted Y).

 

 

> Otherwise he would not have acted deliberately to bring about that

> outcome.

 

Please prove this, namely that if Srila Prabhupada wanted several diksa

gurus, he would not have made himself recognized and accepted as the sole

diksa guru for ISKCON. Remember that no other diksa guru was available.

 

 

> He always acted deliberately.

 

I did not ask you to prove that he acted deliberately.

 

 

> Both the act and the outcome you agree is proven.

 

I did not ask you to prove the act or the outcome.

 

 

I predict that you will not produce a proof that in 1966 Srila Prabhupada

wanted to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON. You will only present proofs of

things that I did not ask you to prove. And you will again claim that you

know what Srila Prabhupada wanted as if you can read his mind.

 

ys Ramakanta dasa