Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

 

> Your speculative reasons for ‘why’ Srila Prabhupada may have acted as he

> did are irrelevant to point a) for reasons I have already explained

> several times before and will not explain again.

 

You are right: Any presented reason why Srila Prabhupada made himself

recognized and accepted as the sole diksa guru for ISKCON is speculation

(unless confirmed by a statement from Srila Prabhupada). This includes the

reason that we just have discussed, namely that in 1966 Srila Prabhupada

allegedly wanted to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON. So you agree with me.

 

Now you don't have to answer any further points. Just confirm that your

claim (in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON)

is irrelevant unproven speculation.

 

 

> Since you apparently agree that Srila Prabhupada always acted

> deliberately, and that we do not need to read his mind to know this since

> it is within the very definition of the term ‘Krishna Consciousness’, do

> you therefore agree that when...

>

> “Srila Prabhupada made himself recognised and accepted as the sole diksa

> guru for ISKCON in 1966” (a fact you agree is proven)

>

> he did so deliberately?

 

I will not answer this question for another additional reason: It is

irrelevant to your point a) 'why' or 'how' Srila Prabhupada acted as he did.

 

 

ys Ramakanta dasa