Guest guest Posted May 2, 2006 Report Share Posted May 2, 2006 An Alarm Call for the alert citizens of India Make your choice - What you want ? A few crumbs of Dollars or Pounds smeared in the blood and flesh of innocent animals ? OR Adhering to the principle of non-violence and compliance with fundamental duty under the Constitution to have compassion towards all living creatures ? The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has recently given directions to the Central Government to review its meat export policy. This direction was given in Civil Appeal No. 3968 of 1994 - Akhil Bharat Krishi Goseva Sangh & Ors. V/s. A.P. Pollution Control Board and Ors. A major meat exporter i.e. Al-Kabeer Exports Ltd. having their mega mechanised export oriented slaughter houses near Hyderabad was one of the Respondents. During the days of acute foreign exchange shortage sometime in 1990-91 the Central Government was desperately looking for avenues to increase foreign exchange earnings and in that process it had identified meat export as a thrust area. It formulated a policy to promote meat export and gave various incentives for this sector. Over the period of last 15 years, this policy has spelt doom for the Indian rural economy and now needs to be reviewed so as to totally abandon this policy. The reasons or factors for abandoning this policy are as under: 1) The point of origin of this policy was shortage of foreign exchange. Now the situation is extremely comfortable. The country has foreign reserves of approx. US $ 150 billions, which works out to Rs. 6,75,000 crores. As against this, the earnings from meat export are only Rs. 1,500 to 2000 crores. India has since developed many other sectors which yield substantial foreign exchange earnings such as IT, Textiles, Gems & Jewellery, Engineering goods etc. The earning of Rs.1500/- crores from meat export is earned after destroying the national wealth of cattle. Nobody in authority has assessed the actual cost for earning these Rs.1,500/- crores. The cost runs into thousands of crores of rupees. It deprives lakhs of people of their livelihood permanently and affects the agricultural sector by depriving the source of organic manure, fuel and draught power. 2) There is no monitoring mechanism available with the Government which can indicate at any given point of time the availability of legally slaughterable animals after compliance with all necessary laws vis-à-vis the slaughter capacity set up in the country and the actual number of animals slaughtered every year for local consumption and for exports. As the private sector has entered this industry purely for business with profit motive, they do not stop after slaughtering the legally slaughterable animals but do slaughter young and healthy animals which cannot be slaughtered legally. The dwindling number of cattle population indicates all round slaughter (of all ages of animals). 3) There is an inherent contradiction as noted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in one of its interim judgement in the above referred case. The demands of export market make it imperative that only young and healthy animals are slaughtered, whereas the local laws in the country prohibit slaughter of young and useful animals. This contradiction is ir-reconcilable and the growing exports mean that the local laws are grossly violated. 4) Many arms of the Government have recommended stoppage of meat export. The Law Commission, the National Cattle Commission and the Animal Welfare Board of India have recommended to the Government that meat export be stopped. The Standing Committee on Agriculture from the Lok Sabha recommended taking steps to increase the cattle population, which is not possible if meat export is continued. In addition, there is countrywide resentment against this policy and in a democratic set up the wish of people must be respected. 5) The published figures of human population and cattle population over the years has indicated that there is steep decline in the ratio of cattle population per 1000 human population. The ratio of cow progeny animals has dropped from 278 to 182, of buffaloes from 100 to 93, of goats from 136 to 116 and of sheep from 69 to 60 between a short span of 2 decades. 6) Indian economy is predominantly agro-based and cattle play an important role for this economy. Hence various States have enacted animal preservation laws looking to the cattle population of their States and their need for such cattle. Hence there are variations in restrictions regarding slaughter of animals. However, for the meat exporters the entire country is a source of their raw-material and they buy animals from wherever they are available and transport them to the States where they can be slaughtered. In this process an animal which is not slaughterable as per the local law of a particular State gets slaughtered in some other State, where the law of the State of the origin of the animal has no meaning. For example, a buffalo below the age of 16 years cannot be slaughtered in M.P. However, if it is transported to the State of A.P. which permits slaughter of buffaloes above age of 10 years, such buffaloes become slaughterable in A.P. even if it below the age of 16 years. Such rampant violation of law is possible in respect of many other provisions also. 7) We have analyzed the comparative economic advantages and disadvantages of the meat export policy which can be explained if need be. 8) We appeal to all concerned citizens to write to Central Government and create a strong public opinion against meat export and eventually compel the Central Government to abandon the Policy of meat export and put a statutory ban on it. 29th April, 2006 - Viniyog Parivar Trust Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.