Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP! > But your whole challenge is based on speculation. The speculation that > maybe Srila Prabhupada wanted to do something other than what he actually > deliberately did. So you have contradicted yourself. Sorry, this is not a proof of your claim. Do you know what a proof is in spiritual circles? Such a proof it a quote from guru, sadhu or sastra. My challenge to you was and is following: "You claimed that in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON. Please prove that." Now please explain to us where in this challenge is any speculation. Also, let us look at following fictitious debate: A: It rained. B: Please prove that. A: The streets are wet. Therefore, it must have rained. B: That is not a proof because it could also have snowed. A: Your whole challenge is based on speculation. A's last statement is nonsense. Isn't it? Please try again to prove your claim that in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted to be the sole diksa guru for ISKCON, or admit that it is unproven. ys Ramakanta dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.